To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=29848
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 27 08:59:02 +
2008 ---
Well, this bug isn't to fix all the possible cases, just the most common ones.
- M
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86049
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 19 17:55:24 +
2008 ---
Of course this workaround exists. But I'd like to send these the large docs to
any
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86049
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 17 18:19:02 +
2008 ---
So what was then about bug 31612?
Honestly, I don't get your logic...
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86049
User bettlerthomas changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 12 21:16:17 +
2008 ---
OK, ok, just to give you the choice
reopen this one ...
or treat its successo
|ui
Assigned to|oc
Reported by|bettlerthomas
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 12 21:14:53 +
2008 ---
Please increase the column limit to match at least the limit of MS Excel (which
is currently at 16k).
btw: KSpread supports 32k.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 12 21:01:22 +
2008 ---
Well, to insist on the initial request would mean to just ignore all those
proposi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 8 23:50:57 +
2008 ---
So the 1024 columns are now in. Anyway, that's not enough - it's just a
temporary
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6521
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 19 20:32:37 +
2007 ---
Any news on this issue?
I really miss this feature!
---
to|spreadsheet
Reported by|bettlerthomas
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 22 14:09:18 -0800
2006 ---
Important to note:
THIS IS CURRENTLY NOT AN ISSUE, but it will be a future one.
The function munit() in OOCalc stops working for args > 724. However t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 17 10:15:41 -0800
2006 ---
But we should introduce this, as Excel 2007 will handle bigger Spreadsheets
than w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31612
User bettlerthomas changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1633
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 14 09:44:06 -0800
2006 ---
You were right:
Continuing in bug 31612 let's see if that works
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 14 09:41:28 -0800
2006 ---
So, any news here?
Is it still on the To-Do list? (didn´t find it there)
Are there
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1633
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 14 04:47:48 -0800
2006 ---
I realize, this is obviously not a bug. (At least not in your eyes)
However I'like t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1633
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 13 09:27:18 -0800
2006 ---
So, any news here?
Is it still on the To-Do list? (didn´t find it there)
Are there
16 matches
Mail list logo