[framework-issues] [Issue 101217] Digital signature for OOo programm-files

2009-08-13 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101217 --- Additional comments from coleban...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 13 14:07:25 + 2009 --- Kaspersky Anti-Virus solutions (and most likely others too) read the

[framework-issues] [Issue 101217] Digital signature for OOo programm-files

2009-04-20 Thread colebantam
Assigned to|tm Reported by|colebantam --- Additional comments from coleban...@openoffice.org Mon Apr 20 09:37:40 + 2009 --- The Java Executables are all (or mostly?) digitally signed. Why doesn't that belong to the OOo Files too

[sw-issues] [Issue 94736] Automatic linebreak hides space characters

2008-10-07 Thread colebantam
Assigned to|mru Reported by|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 7 12:16:50 + 2008 --- In the OOo 3 Release candidates (tested in RC3 and RC4) space characters are hidden, if a automatic linebreak happens. How to reproduce: 1. Open

[dba-issues] [Issue 49974] DB Access to AddressBook, NULL value handling erroneous/strange!

2008-07-20 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49974 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 20 11:29:59 + 2008 --- Works for me with OOoDev300m25 and Thunderbird Addressbook. Both, IS Null and IS

[sw-issues] [Issue 90511] Linefeed added by copy p aste

2008-07-20 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90511 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 20 11:34:12 + 2008 --- Works for me in OOoDev300m25 :-) Thanks!

[sw-issues] [Issue 90511] Linefeed added by copy p aste

2008-06-09 Thread colebantam
Assigned to|mru Reported by|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 9 08:17:18 + 2008 --- When I copy a string in OOo Writer 2.4.1 RC2 and paste it into a text editor (notepad.exe) there is allways a linefeed added at the end. Very anoying

[sw-issues] [Issue 90511] Linefeed added by copy p aste

2008-06-09 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90511 User colebantam changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 90511] Linefeed added by copy p aste

2008-06-09 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90511 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 9 08:28:28 + 2008 --- Ohhh I forgot. The same happens in OOo-Dev_DEV300_m17.

[sw-issues] [Issue 90511] Linefeed added by copy p aste

2008-06-09 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90511 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 9 21:00:43 + 2008 --- Sorry, but does Target Milestone OOo 3.0 mean, that this regression will not be

[dba-issues] [Issue 49974] DB Access to AddressBook, NULL value handling erroneous/strange!

2008-05-21 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49974 User colebantam changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 70151] database explorer need to select address_query again by mailmerge printi ng

2008-03-19 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70151 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 19 09:00:57 + 2008 --- Is this (realy anoying) problem indeed so hard to fix, that it must be postponed

[dba-issues] [Issue 87236] Thunderbird Adressbook - ' IS EMPTY' query delivers wrong data

2008-03-19 Thread colebantam
Priority|P3 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 19 09:18:45 + 2008 --- Making a query on the Thunderbird Adressbook as database fails, when 'IS EMPTY

[dba-issues] [Issue 87237] Thunderbird Adressbook - d b-criteria 'IS NOT EMPTY' leads to error SQL- Status: HY000, Statement too complex

2008-03-19 Thread colebantam
| Resolution| Issue type|DEFECT Priority|P3 Subcomponent|none Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 19 09:24:31 + 2008 --- Making

[dba-issues] [Issue 87236] Thunderbird Adressbook - ' IS EMPTY' query delivers wrong data

2008-03-19 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87236 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 19 09:26:15 + 2008 --- The mentioned related issue - Issue 87237

[dba-issues] [Issue 86991] Mailmerge doesn't work as usual in 2.4 RC2 and RC4

2008-03-15 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86991 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 15 09:40:43 + 2008 --- -os: Thanks for your help. I already knew the merge into fields solution. But

[dba-issues] [Issue 86991] Mailmerge doesn't work in 2.4 RC2 and RC4

2008-03-13 Thread colebantam
Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 13 10:26:44 + 2008 --- Printing Documents with embedded Datafields doesn't update these fields with the current data in the document. Reproduce: 1

[dba-issues] [Issue 86991] Mailmerge doesn't work as usual in 2.4 RC2 and RC4

2008-03-13 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86991 User colebantam changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[l10n-issues] [Issue 59086] [DE] Pers?nliches Adre?b uch instead of Persönliches Adreßbuch

2006-06-01 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59086 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 1 03:03:13 -0700 2006 --- I have tested this with OOo 2.0.3 RC4, and it is fixed :-) Thanks to the

[dba-issues] [Issue 50681] Address-Book Datasource W izard must allow user to specify addressbook l ocation

2006-02-24 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 24 01:45:46 -0800 2006 --- colebantam atjensen: Just look one post ago: So there is a workaround - rename

[dba-issues] [Issue 62370] New - Cannot connect to Ou tlook Addresses if Distribution List exists

2006-02-21 Thread colebantam
:|DEFECT Priority:|P3 Subcomponent:|none Assigned to:|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by:|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 21 00:30:54 -0800 2006 --- If there is one ore more distribution lists

[dba-issues] [Issue 59084] Cannot connect to Outlook Addresses in special case

2006-02-21 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59084 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 21 00:34:44 -0800 2006 --- colebantam-clu: Sorry for mixing up two issues. I will remember

[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2006-01-26 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 03:32:21 -0800 2006 --- DicBack.cmd: To correct an possible misunderstanding. DicBack.cmd was not intended

[dba-issues] [Issue 59086] OOo2.0.x shows Persö?li ches Adre?buch instead of Persönliches Adre ßbuch

2005-12-19 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59086 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 19 03:40:23 -0800 2005 --- Uuuups. Just saw that I misspelled the wrong Adressbook. It should be named

[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2005-12-18 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 06:43:30 -0800 2005 --- I wrote a small batchfile which reads the installation folder from the registry,

[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2005-12-18 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 User colebantam changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[installation-issues] [Issue 58847] Previous (2.0.0) Version not found

2005-12-13 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58847 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 02:13:36 -0800 2005 --- @is: Thank you!

[installation-issues] [Issue 59171] Shared configuration lost during update

2005-12-10 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59171 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 10:53:27 -0800 2005 --- Danke Andre, warst schon wieder schneller ;-) Soll ich das mit dem All

[installation-issues] [Issue 58847] Previous (2.0.0) Version not found

2005-12-09 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58847 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 9 09:27:02 -0800 2005 --- Overwriting or delete/write, its the same result ;-) OK, I think this issue is

[dba-issues] [Issue 59084] New - Cannot connect to Ou tlook Addresses

2005-12-08 Thread colebantam
Subcomponent:|none Assigned to:|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by:|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 04:08:42 -0800 2005 --- If one of the folowing conditions are true, I cannot acces the outlook addressbook: 1.) Outlook is not set

[installation-issues] [Issue 58847] Previous (2.0.0) Version not found

2005-12-08 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58847 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 04:19:17 -0800 2005 --- Glad to see that Andre has posted that already. I have the some problem, with OO

[installation-issues] [Issue 58847] Previous (2.0.0) Version not found

2005-12-08 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58847 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 04:29:12 -0800 2005 --- I think this issue should be targeted to 2.0.1. Or does anyone realy wants to

[dba-issues] [Issue 59086] New - OOo2.0.x shows Pers ö?liches Adre?buch instead of Persönliches Adreßbuch

2005-12-08 Thread colebantam
:| Issue type:|DEFECT Priority:|P3 Subcomponent:|none Assigned to:|dbaneedsconfirm Reported by:|colebantam --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 04:42:35 -0800 2005 --- If I connect to my Thunderbird Addressbook

[dba-issues] [Issue 50681] Address-Book Datasource W izard must allow user to specify addressbook l ocation

2005-12-08 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=50681 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 07:17:57 -0800 2005 --- I had the same problem just now. I configered the Thunderbird adressbook several

[installation-issues] [Issue 58847] Previous (2.0.0) Version not found

2005-12-08 Thread colebantam
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58847 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 8 08:45:49 -0800 2005 --- Due to is comment, I retested the whole case. It is correkt that 2.0.1 imports