To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109359
User doehrm changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
pting
Assigned to|cd
Reported by|doehrm
--- Additional comments from doe...@openoffice.org Wed Feb 17 09:59:44
+ 2010 ---
I'm trying to build DEV300_m63 on Windows 2008 R2.
Build runs upon link time of mkdepend and fails with
=
Building modul
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59729
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 25 18:11:51 -0800
2006 ---
Checked out SRC680_m152 and still getting this:
Making: ../../../unxsoli4.pro/slo/
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61120
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 25 03:25:09 -0800
2006 ---
pjanik: I'm using anoncvs...
After having checkout out manually the module ucbhelp
Assigned to:|mhu
Reported by:|doehrm
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 24 09:52:45 -0800
2006 ---
I checked out a fresh SRC680_m152 tree and getting this after having configured:
> dmake -P6
Checking module list
build -- version: 1.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=59294
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 23:59:40 -0800
2005 ---
As for I386 I'm building with Studio 11 since it's out - and it's working.
> CC -V
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54319
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 3 02:57:35 -0800
2005 ---
Finally on the second box I was able to build SRC680_m143 :-)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54319
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 30 08:33:05 -0800
2005 ---
I'm installing the patch now on the newly built box and I'll try again. The
"new" b
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54319
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 30 08:05:27 -0800
2005 ---
5. Resolution
This issue is addressed in the following releases:
[...]
x86 Platfo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54319
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 18 04:03:38 -0800
2005 ---
I have started the build on the other new box again, this time with Studio 11.
It
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54319
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 08:49:14 -0800
2005 ---
I installed a new Box with Solaris 9 and all available patches and I'm still
gettin
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54319
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 04:31:29 -0800
2005 ---
No - I built always on the same box - not regularly though - but the box itself
was
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54319
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 12 11:31:57 -0800
2005 ---
Ok - you're right :-) This issue is raised against m127 - but the problem was
even
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54319
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 12 11:18:23 -0800
2005 ---
I can't say for sure but I believe the last build that worked was m129.
Although
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54319
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 12 10:56:57 -0800
2005 ---
yes - same here...
I built older versions of OOO without problems on this box sinc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54319
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 2 17:32:21 -0800
2005 ---
using patch 18 leads to a "hanging" checkdll again...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54319
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 2 13:06:27 -0800
2005 ---
All builds that failed are done with patchlevel 19 (of this particular patch). I
ha
SIZE RES STATETIMECPU COMMAND
17811 doehrm 1 100 22M 3856K cpu/1 66:38 49.16% checkdll
it's sitting now for over an hour.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~>pstack 17811
17811: /overnet/oocvs/solver/680/unxsoli4.pro/bin/checkdll ../unxsoli4.pro/li
d07a0920 lm_move (d07f11e4
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|doehrm
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 7 06:05:26 -0700
2005 ---
Checked out SRC680_m127:
CC -w -mt -z combreloc -PIC -temp=/tmp -R'$ORIGIN' -norunpath -library=no%Cstd
-z text -G -Bdirect -
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45934
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 06:23:20 -0800
2005 ---
ENABLE_PASF is set to YES, unset it manually in the environment, now it's
building
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45934
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 04:42:27 -0800
2005 ---
configure was done like:
CC=cc CXX=CC ./configure --with-gnu-patch=/opt/sfw/bin/pa
Assigned to:|mh
Reported by:|doehrm
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 04:41:07 -0800
2005 ---
=
Building project portaudio
=
/export/home/doehrm/oocvs/portaudio
-
mkdir ./unxsoli4.pro/misc/build
22 matches
Mail list logo
