To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89930
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 23 10:57:42 +
2008 ---
I've just tested the OO 3 with the just released KernelEx 0.3.6. And, it works.
So
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89930
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 15 15:22:11 +
2008 ---
To persuade the OpenOffice 3 beta to run on a Windows 98 I do have to know what
is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89930
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 15 11:45:23 +
2008 ---
I'm not a KernelEx expert, but it does provide some Unicode translation
functional
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89930
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 12 06:35:12 +
2008 ---
Indeed, I've foung the .EXE files.
Sadly, I'm unable to launch any of them, as an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89930
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 12 05:33:21 +
2008 ---
Double clicking on the openofficeorg30.msi file makes setup to do some work.
But,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89930
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 11 19:52:46 +
2008 ---
The support for Windows 98 and ME was withdrawed intentionaly, as far as I know.
T
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32785
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 11 12:03:59 +
2008 ---
I have got yet another point.
The OpenOffice does read the Excel 95 files correctl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89930
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 11 09:28:07 +
2008 ---
It's quite possible the OpenOffice 3 will be able to work in Windows 98 as is,
wit
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=32785
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 21:03:28 +
2008 ---
There is an article on the Microsoft server referring to the BIFF5 file
creation:
Assigned to|mh
Reported by|forsoft
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 25 16:45:41 +
2008 ---
The beta version of the OpenOffice 3.0 does not work with Windows 98/ME.
The Windows 9x systems are still supported by the MSFN community. The
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|formatting
Assigned to|spreadsheet
Reported by|forsoft
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 21 10:12:33 +
2007 ---
Changing of a range of cells to the Standard format fails, if one of the cells
in the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46511
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 21 09:31:11 +
2007 ---
I think the issue 36393 is a bit similiar to this one. What's more important i
fou
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36393
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 21 09:16:37 +
2007 ---
That's interesting.
I've noticed the amount of decimal places used in a standard f
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62944
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 10 03:19:45 -0700
2006 ---
It looks somehow related to the issue 60152:
http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=60152
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 10 03:17:42 -0700
2006 ---
It is a very similiar problem to mine. I posted it in issue:
http://qa.openoffice.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62944
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 10 03:08:24 -0700
2006 ---
I'm sorry to say this, but the problem still exists in the OOo 2.0.3
I was testing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62944
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 21 03:56:25 -0700
2006 ---
In the Linux Calc version the result of the '0 ' and '0" "' formating strings
is t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62944
User forsoft changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
-import
Assigned to:|spreadsheet
Reported by:|forsoft
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 8 11:28:40 -0800
2006 ---
I like to format numbers with user formating string by adding an extra space at
the end of the string ie. &#
19 matches
Mail list logo
