To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 5 14:36:13 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=53385)
Row synchronisation problem
|P3
Subcomponent|editing
Assigned to|mru
Reported by|kfen
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 5 14:31:32 +
2008 ---
Row synchronization still does not work as expected:
Take an n x m table (n, m > 3)
Merge all cells in col
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 5 12:54:48 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=53383)
Row synchronisation problem
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 5 12:39:40 +
2008 ---
Row synchronization still does not work as expected:
Take an n x m table (n, m > 3)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 4 10:48:35 +
2008 ---
kfen->ama&jkaufmann
I think jkaufmann has a valid point with his referenc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 25 07:59:08 +
2007 ---
OK. I see your point. The solution may be technically OK. However, from a user
persp
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 25 06:58:53 +
2007 ---
This is not completely fixed in Version 2.3. Vertical merge works for tables
with mo
