To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102625
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Fri Jan 14 08:33:51 +
2011 ---
Did anything change from Dec 3? Or is this request just for msc?
I did verify
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102625
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 6 10:22:08 +
2010 ---
OK, I see where you are coming from. You need to refetch backward cursor
positi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102625
User ludob changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115384
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 26 09:14:37 +
2010 ---
OK. Fair enough.
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115384
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 26 08:06:33 +
2010 ---
I correctly understood that you were faking the length for boolean fields to 1.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115384
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 25 18:17:38 +
2010 ---
Had a look at dba34b: #i115384# check if the length of BIT > 1 otherwise use
se
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115398
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Wed Nov 17 08:43:26 +
2010 ---
No new problems encountered with bit fields since I applied the patch.
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115398
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Sat Nov 6 21:34:57 +
2010 ---
The problem is caused by OFieldDescription::getSpecialTypeInfo(). For one reaso
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115384
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Sat Nov 6 14:34:03 +
2010 ---
The problem is in dbaccess/source/ui/uno/copytablewizard.cxx.
changeset 266756
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115401
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 5 13:19:18 +
2010 ---
I did some further investigation into what ADO reports as NUMERIC_PRECISION and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115398
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 4 14:15:58 +
2010 ---
The JDBC driver doesn't handle autoincrement fields at all. The field id in the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115401
User ludob changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|none
Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm
Reported by|ludob
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 4 10:34:22 +
2010 ---
Copy MS Access table containing currency fields to ODBC databases or internal
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115401
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 4 10:35:29 +
2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=72853)
MS Access table containing currency field
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115398
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 4 10:14:48 +
2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=72851)
MS Access table with 2 integer fields, Autoval
type|DEFECT
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|none
Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm
Reported by|ludob
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 4 10:13:00 +
2010 ---
Copy a MS Access table containing integer fields to an ODBC
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115384
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 4 07:23:33 +
2010 ---
Original mdb's are too big to attach so I created a new one. 1 table containing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115384
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 4 07:25:31 +
2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=72843)
Access test file. 1 table with bit field
---
|P3
Subcomponent|none
Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm
Reported by|ludob
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Wed Nov 3 19:15:19 +
2010 ---
Copying an ms access table containing a bit field (field type Yes/No [bit]) with
copytablewizard
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102623
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 10 17:18:35 +
2010 ---
I had a further look into this. Part of the problem is the windows ODBC manager
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102623
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 10 16:53:30 +
2010 ---
Tested on OOO320m12 and the problem is still there. Used the MyQL 5.1 driver an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106422
User ludob changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106422
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Wed Dec 16 10:06:59 +
2009 ---
OK
I noticed the changes for 64-bit ODBC (SQLINTEGER -> SQLLEN etc). Great, bu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102791
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Wed Dec 16 08:59:03 +
2009 ---
OK
-
Plea
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106422
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 15 11:35:01 +
2009 ---
How can I get to dba33b? svn://svn.services.openoffice.org/ooo/cws only goes
up
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102791
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 29 15:05:03 +
2009 ---
In the new function OPreparedStatement::setDecimal I left
::rtl::OString
aStri
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102791
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 29 14:58:17 +
2009 ---
OK. Here it goes (not a real diff):
connectivity/source/drivers/odbcbase/OTool
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106422
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 29 11:31:13 +
2009 ---
Your solution uses the original seq data but OPreparedStatement::setParameter
s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106422
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 29 10:28:51 +
2009 ---
When trying to figure out a patch I encountered in OTools::bindData case
SQL_VA
|none
Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm
Reported by|ludob
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 29 09:41:38 +
2009 ---
Copying binary data to an ODBC datasource using the table wizard crashes OOO.
The problem is that the pointer to the binary
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101280
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Wed Jul 1 09:13:46 +
2009 ---
I have no intention to hijack this bug. "Stop" should return to user control.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101280
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 24 11:37:31 +
2009 ---
In issue 102625 I explained in detail that in order to get the key values from
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101280
User ludob changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102791
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 24 09:05:01 +
2009 ---
Numeric is a little more complex but for Decimal I agree that data should be
tr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66846
User ludob changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102625
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Fri Jun 19 06:22:50 +
2009 ---
Same as Issue 66846?
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102625
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Jun 18 14:29:48 +
2009 ---
Same as issue 101280?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101280
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Thu Jun 18 13:06:14 +
2009 ---
Looks like OOO is reading here also the whole table just to get the key values
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|none
Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm
Reported by|ludob
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 15 12:16:58 +
2009 ---
ODBC binds NUMERIC and DECIMAL statement parameters as CHAR. As a result the
values are
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102625
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Sun Jun 14 08:09:38 +
2009 ---
Same as issue 98548 ??
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=98548
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Sun Jun 14 08:07:09 +
2009 ---
Last week I issued 102625 (Table Data View + ODBC issues select * from table to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102623
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 10 18:41:48 +
2009 ---
same behavior in OOO310m11
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102623
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 10 08:28:28 +
2009 ---
same behavior in OOO310m11
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102625
User ludob changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|none
Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm
Reported by|ludob
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Tue Jun 9 17:40:48 +
2009 ---
Opening a table for viewing issues a few "select * from table where 0=1&qu
type|DEFECT
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|none
Assigned to|dbaneedsconfirm
Reported by|ludob
--- Additional comments from lu...@openoffice.org Tue Jun 9 16:22:17 +
2009 ---
When selecting in Database properties / Additional settings /
46 matches
Mail list logo