To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93393
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93393
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92818
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 2 16:28:55 +
2008 ---
The function realpath requires the the buffer size PATH_MAX. There was used only
1024b big one in cppuhelper/source/findsofficepath.c.
It caused crashes with a test mono extension. I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93393
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 2 16:35:01 +
2008 ---
Adding the issue #93393. Looks simple and rather important.
I am sorry if this is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93393
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92818
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93116
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 27 08:34:41 +
2008 ---
Before I start hacking on a better configure check, is there any chance to
accept
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93116
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 27 16:06:22 +
2008 ---
JDK 1.5 is able to build stax from source. JDK 1.4 is now...
Also note that stax
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 25 17:30:18 +
2008 ---
There was needed a fix to build OOo-2.x with IBM Java 1.5.0, see the issue
#80023.
It is even worse with IBM Java 1.6.0 where the _JNI_IMPORT_OR_EXPORT_ value is
not defined at all
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93113
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 25 17:45:03 +
2008 ---
I have compiled OOo-3.0 with IBM Java 1.6.0.
I'll attach a patch that enables the build in config_office/configure.in and do
some necessary updates in config_office/set_soenv.in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93114
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 25 17:55:41 +
2008 ---
We would like to use the same JDK for the whole distribution. We currently use
the version 1.6. Though, we would like to provide Java 1.5 compatible byte-code
where possible.
I'll attach a patch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93115
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93115
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93115
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93115
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 25 17:59:32 +
2008 ---
I am sorry. The second patch was wrong. It was for another issue...
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 25 18:06:49 +
2008 ---
There is the external/StAX/README_jsr173_1.0_api.jar that describes a
possibility to use the prebuilt jsr173_1.0_api.jar. It would help to build saxon
with JDK 1.4.
Unfortunately
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93116
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92092
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76871
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to|fs
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 24 14:08:50 +
2008 ---
ooobasis3.0-core04 currently depends on ooobasis3.0-base because libdbaxml is
newly linked against libdbu:
--- cut ---
$:/opt/openoffice.org/basis3.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90830
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90830
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Subcomponent|none
Assigned to|fs
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 24 18:47:43 +
2008 ---
I get the following build error with dev300-m21:
--- cut ---
In file included from
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/ooo-build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=91025
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79559
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79559
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 23 14:08:19 +
2008 ---
There are more problems reported with German compound words at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79559
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|mh
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 18 15:29:36 +
2008 ---
The problem appeared in the script
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/ooo-build/trunk/bin/cws-extract that could be used to
extract
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90853
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89718
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 17 09:14:13 +
2008 ---
*** Issue 90765 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90765
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to|cd
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 17 18:35:10 +
2008 ---
It comes from https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=399101. The unopkg
tool displayed messages in random locales.
unopkg initializes the resource manages
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90820
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90765
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90765
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90765
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86080
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 4 18:55:17 +
2008 ---
Just a note. We needed to replace mktemp -d --tmpdir with mktemp -d -t. The
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90155
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 3 08:59:07 +
2008 ---
I see it now. The split makes sense to me.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90076
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 3 16:36:28 +
2008 ---
We found another way to reproduce this crash, see
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90155
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 15:02:38 +
2008 ---
I tested the build based on ooh680-m16 sources and ooo-build-2-4-1 branch. It
crashed on the C# sample that could be found in
/odk/examples/CLI/CSharp/Spreadsheet
The crash
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90076
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90076
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 15:05:33 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=54033)
gdb log with the backtrace
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90076
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 15:06:33 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=54034)
the valgrind log showing that the memory is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90076
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 15:09:52 +
2008 ---
Search the valgrind log for cellsuno.cxx:1642 to find the revelant part.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=90076
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 28 15:12:04 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=54035)
cellsuno.cxx patched by ooo-build that were used
to|is
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 14 17:11:57 +
2008 ---
The string How do you want to proceed after creating the form? is shrinked in
some localizations, like in the French one.
The size of the labes is too limited without
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89475
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=89475
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 14 17:16:06 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=53632)
Screeshot showing the problem.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65752
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 12 15:22:25 +
2008 ---
I agree that the best solution is to recode the filenames. Though, you might get
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79800
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 29 12:41:34 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=53252)
the patches ported for dev300-m10
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79800
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 29 12:43:13 +
2008 ---
I have attached the patches ported for dev300-m10. They worked for me on Linux.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79800
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 24 12:13:32 +
2008 ---
pmladek-is: I though that you wanted to put binfilters into a separate package.
I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86880
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86880
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 22 15:44:27 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=53118)
Another propossed fix.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87258
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 10 07:21:25 +
2008 ---
obr: good catch!
I think that the symlink detection is correct. The problem is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87258
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86886
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86887
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84760
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87258
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 2 15:44:04 +
2008 ---
Yup, the new patch works for me. Thanks a lot for taking care of it!
to|mh
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 27 17:07:10 +
2008 ---
There is a broken logic in the configure check for --enable-reportdesign (AND
vs. OR). The reportdesign is disabled if you use --enable-reportdesign ;-)
I'll attach
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87518
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
to|mru
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 21:44:15 +
2008 ---
The box around the selected header in the Navigator is a bit screwed sometimes.
Steps to reproduce:
1. Open test-plus-minus.odt
2. Open Navigator (F5)
3. Select
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87444
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 21:45:17 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=52290)
test-plus-minus.odt test document
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87444
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 25 21:45:50 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=52291)
Screenshot showing the screwed border.
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 19 16:15:32 +
2008 ---
I have one more fix for the senddoc script.
The /usr/bin/seamonkey wrapper is a symlink on openSUSE-10.3. It is not
correctly detected by the ooo-home/program/senddoc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87258
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86886
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 11 17:00:15 +
2008 ---
Sure, it is perfectly fine to use separate block for groupwise if it is not
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|ama
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 10 15:39:06 +
2008 ---
We mark the warning: comparison with string literal results in unspecified
behaviour as an error in our
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86880
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 10 17:15:49 +
2008 ---
I'll attach a patch that adds support for the GroupWise mail client. It actually
has the same options like evolution.
I only had to change the option attachment= from attach
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86886
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|pl
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 10 17:19:17 +
2008 ---
I'll add a fix that allows to send documents with a space in the name via the
sylpheed-claws mail client
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86887
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86551
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86551
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 29 14:04:27 +
2008 ---
Hmm, the same problem is also on ppc. We should probably add the include for all
to|mh
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 28 17:45:34 +
2008 ---
The bridges module does not compile with gcc-4.3 on i586. I am using:
gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.3.0 20080221 (prerelease) [gcc-4_3-branch revision 132521]
I'll attach
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86551
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85771
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85771
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 31 14:25:35 +
2008 ---
The new icc module does not compile with gcc-4.3 on x86_64. I am using:
gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.3.0 20080122 (experimental) [trunk revision 131724]
I'll attach a patch
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 30 15:54:31 +
2008 ---
Our build system looks for more dangerous warnings. It has found missing sprintf
argument in the new icc external module.
I'll attach a patch that solves the problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85736
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85679
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Priority|P3
Subcomponent|code
Assigned to|mh
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 29 14:01:36 +
2008 ---
The recent versions of the GNU linker started to support:
-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions
Reported by|pmladek
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 15 13:17:20 +
2008 ---
kso@ as discussed in the issue i#82569, there is needed a change to build
OOo-2.4 with neon-0.24. I will attach the proposed patch. Could you please check
if it is fine from your point
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85265
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85265
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85265
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 15 15:49:39 +
2008 ---
kso: Thanks a lot. I am sorry that I have been so late.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65937
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65937
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65937
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69368
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 2 13:07:25 +
2008 ---
pmladek-cmc: I am fine with your solution. Thanks for taking care
201 - 300 of 921 matches
Mail list logo
