To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66600
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 23 02:54:43 -0700
2006 ---
Sorry, accidentally deleted part of the post. Should read ->
A windows error mess
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66600
User psychoinc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
:|code
Assigned to:|spreadsheet
Reported by:|psychoinc
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 20 07:47:01 -0700
2006 ---
The onstruction at "0x5f9e2e11" referenced memery at "0x". The memory
could not be "r
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47082
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 16:13:43 -0700
2005 ---
Just tried it on m104, and the problem seems to have gone - Perhaps this was a
sid
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47083
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 16:20:44 -0700
2005 ---
There's still some problems with this in m104.
When you press send, a windows cras
:|code
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|psychoinc
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 9 02:51:27 -0700
2005 ---
When Writer crashes, on re-starting Writer, the Document Recovery tool
succesfully recovers the document/s and allows you to enter
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47082
User psychoinc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Subcomponent:|editing
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|psychoinc
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 9 02:27:31 -0700
2005 ---
I've had to create several documents containing large numbers of .png images
(average is 40) each on a separate
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39748
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 11:45:44 -0800
2005 ---
You're correct, tongro.
As of HTML 4.0, (almost) all tag extentions are depreciate