To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4579
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 23 12:41:28 +
2008 ---
gudmund - 'If you know of a general method for getting special characters via
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 30 01:13:08 +
2007 ---
I'm still digesting scottydm's very interesting post.
In the meanwhile, I wonder
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 28 10:26:45 +
2007 ---
Hi - I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for their contribution to this
issue.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 9 10:52:50 +
2007 ---
Barry - yes I can easily believe it's been around longer than that. I guess it
was
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 9 12:46:11 +
2007 ---
fmc – I am personally not worried about what it looks like in justified
alignment,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 8 22:58:59 +
2007 ---
Barry - forget it. Nobody will ever do anything about this any way. It was first
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6847
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 16 09:49:34 +
2007 ---
Just to tidy this, there's a mildly updated version of the macro that resolves
this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4579
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 8 16:08:52 +
2007 ---
AS
'The office knows all the stuff you describe here'. Thanks for the laugh. If the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4579
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 5 16:05:21 +
2007 ---
I've been thinking about this and attach a solution. It's a trivial macro that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4579
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 5 16:09:28 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=44886)
macro to insert accented character
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6847
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 5 16:12:58 +
2007 ---
I've added a comment and attachment to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4579
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 5 22:57:14 +
2007 ---
Discoleo, as far as I'm concerned, to my problem it's a solution, not a
workaround.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4579
User redi2go changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6847
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 4 10:51:10 +
2007 ---
discoleo
I don't want to get into a great argument about this. The summary says
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4579
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 30 12:44:39 +
2007 ---
I would like to support opaben's suggestion for this issue - ie use the same
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4579
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 30 12:48:30 +
2007 ---
Also, should not issue 6847 be folded into this one - they're obviously the same
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6847
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 30 15:19:50 +
2007 ---
discoleo
the facility you describe is not what I want. I need a method of writing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=61715
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 07:06:43 -0800
2006 ---
I belive mru's analysis is correct as the row height increase occurs when the
'2'
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=55370
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 8 04:10:14 -0800
2006 ---
I have this problem on Windows 2000 with OpenOffice 2.0. The test file acts as
Subcomponent:|editing
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|redi2go
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 6 14:53:12 -0800
2006 ---
If I enter an accented character in a table [eg to get e acute by pressing
Alt+0223] it increases
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20878
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 04:38:24 -0700
2005 ---
I am completely amazed that this does not have higher priority - it infuriates
me
21 matches
Mail list logo