To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from soft...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 2 10:41:22
+ 2009 ---
Big hads hdu ;-)
This sounds really good. This issue is too old in order to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 25 06:35:22 +
2008 ---
Big thanks for finally announcing a target milestone ;-)
My vote for OOo-3.1, sinc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 14 08:21:36 +
2008 ---
Yes, the lack of OTF support is a real show stopper. Given, that there's a large
op
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 7 12:13:07 -0700
2006 ---
Sorry, I meant freetype supports OTF for quite long time now, not opentype.
Sorry
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16032
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 7 12:09:14 -0700
2006 ---
Just to emphasize this once again: TTF is not OTF, it is not even a workaround
in
