To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97248
--- Additional comments from xali...@openoffice.org Thu Dec 3 12:12:50
+ 2009 ---
As I comment already, this is pretty common case, when working with MSWord-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45347
--- Additional comments from xali...@openoffice.org Tue Aug 25 14:17:18
+ 2009 ---
I just found very severe bug in OOO 3.1.0 (not checked with older OOo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=97248
--- Additional comments from xali...@openoffice.org Tue Aug 25 14:23:06
+ 2009 ---
This is very visible with RTF import of Word created document containing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63698
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 18 08:07:12 -0700
2006 ---
Microsoft Word could be configured (registry tweak) that it do not save second
Assigned to|mru
Reported by|xaliger
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 30 01:56:50 -0700
2006 ---
OOo do not read fo:break-before and fo:break-after properties on table rows in
the text documents. OpenDocument specification allows such breaks
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69090
User xaliger changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25680
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 21 01:52:06 -0700
2006 ---
Please, do not forget to RTF (open format) import/export filter. Its nested
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63698
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 21 09:14:33 -0700
2006 ---
RTF specification says the second image representation is needed (in the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45347
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 4 08:03:33 -0700
2006 ---
:-( I think, it should be pretty easy change in rtf import filter. Of course,
not
:|open-import
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|xaliger
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 17 05:40:31 -0800
2006 ---
When open attached RTF (saved in Word 2003) in OOo, you get misplaced image.
Moreover you get 2 images, but there is only 1
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63306
User xaliger changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62982
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 16 09:24:45 -0800
2006 ---
Of course, one couldn't find \fly's description there. And OOo do _not_ read
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62982
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 14 02:53:27 -0800
2006 ---
Should I read it as OpenOffice do not support RTF standard ?
I know there is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62983
User xaliger changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62983
User xaliger changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|xaliger
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 9 08:19:40 -0800
2006 ---
Please, document additions to RTF standart. Since OOO do not read MS Word
shapes (\shp), one have to use flys in rtf writers. But how without
Assigned to:|mru
Reported by:|xaliger
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 9 08:27:25 -0800
2006 ---
Consider anchoring of frames to column (table cell). Without it, its impossible
to reach some effects (e.g. image in front of table).
Attached
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62983
User xaliger changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62983
User xaliger changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45347
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 6 02:18:17 -0800
2005 ---
I have the same problem.
It's caused by different interpretation of:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45347
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 6 03:37:30 -0800
2005 ---
I played with this a little more. OOO behave nicer when FORMTEXT is formfield
21 matches
Mail list logo
