To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 27 01:33:24 -0800
2006 ---
I have created a new section in the OpenOffice.org Wiki called Autopackage
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 9 08:48:38 -0800
2005 ---
hdu:
You are right. After checking with Firefly, it seems that his patch does not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 6 08:16:36 -0800
2005 ---
Wait, I thought the virtual _bold_ style itself depends on freetype = 2.1.10
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 6 08:18:49 -0800
2005 ---
Wait, I thought the virtual _bold_ style itself depends on freetype = 2.1.10
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 5 07:04:28 -0800
2005 ---
I am not sure what's wrong with the screenshot.
Can you upload a screenshot of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 09:45:27 -0800
2005 ---
Re: us, wg
This is very good news indeed that this bug is resolved as fixed,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 8 01:59:38 -0800
2005 ---
Ok, folks. I have some good news.
Mr. Firefly has filled and signed the JCA
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 25 08:04:40 -0700
2005 ---
some comments:
+if (mbUseGamma)
+ mnLoadFlags |=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User zero0w changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 18 09:20:17 -0700
2005 ---
- npower
IF either/both of you could provide a document(s) with examples of CJK
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 09:04:02 -0700
2005 ---
Re: hdu
In the patch there was a small problem with the GlyphCache hashing.
If
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 05:02:17 -0700
2005 ---
If this is no problem we should consider to turn it on for all fonts.
If it is a
between the original and the synthetic
styles matched the wrong font was displayed.
I'll ask Firefly to see if he can find a fix for it.
-zero0w
-
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User zero0w changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
User zero0w changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 6 04:24:36 -0700
2005 ---
Ok, this is a small patch comparing to Firefly's previous numerous patches for
OOo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 6 09:36:34 -0700
2005 ---
Continued from my previous comment.
Let me state what this patch does as far
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 2 07:31:34 -0700
2005 ---
npower:
As far as OpenOffice.org 2.0 is concerned, the printing part is already
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 07:20:07 -0700
2005 ---
Some comment on this issue:
The GNOME HK developers actually created a LiveCD
19 matches
Mail list logo