[installation-issues] [Issue 46333] Native Linux install pack age using autopackage

2006-03-27 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46333 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 27 01:33:24 -0800 2006 --- I have created a new section in the OpenOffice.org Wiki called Autopackage

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-12-09 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 9 08:48:38 -0800 2005 --- hdu: You are right. After checking with Firefly, it seems that his patch does not

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-12-06 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 6 08:16:36 -0800 2005 --- Wait, I thought the virtual _bold_ style itself depends on freetype = 2.1.10

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-12-06 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 6 08:18:49 -0800 2005 --- Wait, I thought the virtual _bold_ style itself depends on freetype = 2.1.10

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-12-05 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 5 07:04:28 -0800 2005 --- I am not sure what's wrong with the screenshot. Can you upload a screenshot of

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-11-14 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 14 09:45:27 -0800 2005 --- Re: us, wg This is very good news indeed that this bug is resolved as fixed,

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-11-08 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 8 01:59:38 -0800 2005 --- Ok, folks. I have some good news. Mr. Firefly has filled and signed the JCA

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-10-25 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 25 08:04:40 -0700 2005 --- some comments: +if (mbUseGamma) + mnLoadFlags |=

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-10-19 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 User zero0w changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-10-19 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 18 09:20:17 -0700 2005 --- - npower IF either/both of you could provide a document(s) with examples of CJK

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-10-17 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 09:04:02 -0700 2005 --- Re: hdu In the patch there was a small problem with the GlyphCache hashing. If

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-10-16 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 16 05:02:17 -0700 2005 --- If this is no problem we should consider to turn it on for all fonts. If it is a

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-10-15 Thread zero0w
between the original and the synthetic styles matched the wrong font was displayed. I'll ask Firefly to see if he can find a fix for it. -zero0w - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-10-06 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 User zero0w changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-10-06 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 User zero0w changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-10-06 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 6 04:24:36 -0700 2005 --- Ok, this is a small patch comparing to Firefly's previous numerous patches for OOo

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-10-06 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 6 09:36:34 -0700 2005 --- Continued from my previous comment. Let me state what this patch does as far

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-10-02 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 2 07:31:34 -0700 2005 --- npower: As far as OpenOffice.org 2.0 is concerned, the printing part is already

[sw-issues] [Issue 18285] Bitstream Vera Serif with out italic (fake italics and bold for display for regular-only fonts)

2005-09-29 Thread zero0w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18285 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 07:20:07 -0700 2005 --- Some comment on this issue: The GNOME HK developers actually created a LiveCD