To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 8 01:16:49 -0700
2005 ---
The OOo command line argument interpretation/evaluation is obviously not
optimal.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 7 11:38:46 -0700
2005 ---
it now looks like there is much more to do about option-functionality for OOo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 5 10:06:19 -0700
2005 ---
hi all,
i was searching for a -v output too ... the idea behind is to give out
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
User sw changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
User sw changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 5 23:36:10 -0700
2005 ---
Hi wsp!
not mandatory, soffice as a UNIX program must have it.
No ... it's not a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 5 23:47:52 -0700
2005 ---
Hi cyb!
Anyway, if such an enhancement would be made - and I think it would be a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 5 00:26:42 -0700
2005 ---
Wolfgang,
supporting a --version is AFAIK only to be interpreted by humans and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 5 03:50:32 -0700
2005 ---
kr: It is quite a problem to manage OOo, but shouldn't we have a central place
in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 5 15:03:40 -0700
2005 ---
Hi kr, hi cyb
not mandatory soffice as a UNIX program must have it. Each of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
User sw changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
User wsp changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 4 08:57:36 -0700
2005 ---
Hi wsp, there is currently no concept of a version number in OOo. So, it is
hard
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 4 10:52:19 -0700
2005 ---
Hi Kay
there is currently no concept of a version number in OOo
and the sales
14 matches
Mail list logo
