[dba-issues] [Issue 101439] Build either the driver f or Evolution 1.x or 2.x

2009-06-10 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101439 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 101439] Build either the driver f or Evolution 1.x or 2.x

2009-05-22 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101439 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 101439] Build either the driver f or Evolution 1.x or 2.x

2009-05-22 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101439 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 101439] Build either the driver f or Evolution 1.x or 2.x

2009-05-22 Thread pmladek
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101439 --- Additional comments from pmla...@openoffice.org Fri May 22 11:33:31 + 2009 --- pmladek-fs: Great, thanks a lot for sorting this out and improving the

[dba-issues] [Issue 101439] Build either the driver f or Evolution 1.x or 2.x

2009-05-04 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101439 User fs changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 101439] Build either the driver f or Evolution 1.x or 2.x

2009-05-04 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101439 --- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon May 4 08:29:29 + 2009 --- why not dropping the evo1 driver at all? I don't believe someeone still uses

[dba-issues] [Issue 101439] Build either the driver f or Evolution 1.x or 2.x

2009-05-04 Thread fs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101439 --- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Mon May 4 09:13:35 + 2009 --- fs-rene: I'm all for removing evoab1. But last time I tried, evoab2 didn't work

[dba-issues] [Issue 101439] Build either the driver f or Evolution 1.x or 2.x

2009-04-29 Thread pmladek
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101439 Issue #|101439 Summary|Build either the driver for Evolution 1.x or 2.x Component|Database access

[dba-issues] [Issue 101439] Build either the driver f or Evolution 1.x or 2.x

2009-04-29 Thread pmladek
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101439 User pmladek changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[dba-issues] [Issue 101439] Build either the driver f or Evolution 1.x or 2.x

2009-04-29 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101439 --- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 29 20:27:58 + 2009 --- I could have sworn they had different library names in the past, whatever about

[dba-issues] [Issue 101439] Build either the driver f or Evolution 1.x or 2.x

2009-04-29 Thread cmc
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101439 User cmc changed the following: What|Old value |New value