To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112359
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 14 13:56:29 +
2010 ---
I am not 100% sure, but I think this actually worked in past releases (prior to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112359
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 14 11:25:26 +
2010 ---
well, iss...@dba is our pool for kind of "external" issues. Without access to
su
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112359
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 14 11:21:41 +
2010 ---
fs: well, as I said I can confirm it. Saw it even before the Debian bug report
c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112359
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112359
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112359
Issue #|112359
Summary|Base broken on armel (he data could not be loaded. Syn
|tax error in SQL expression=
