To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from mhath...@openoffice.org Sun Oct 25 00:11:36
+ 2009 ---
==> atj
Hello Drew.
well, you are right, users may have requested the One-K
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
User atjensen changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from mhath...@openoffice.org Sat Oct 24 02:51:29
+ 2009 ---
==> eberlein
yes of course, explicit commit is substantial to all DBMS. But
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 23 13:59:22 +
2009 ---
Would be possible, though some questions would need to be clarified (nothing
impo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from eberl...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 23 13:49:03
+ 2009 ---
Though autocommit=true is a connection property, it would be a nice to have
f
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from b...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 23 11:18:14 +
2009 ---
Hi Frank, but it makes sense to make a query on "bh" and change the owner
appropr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 23 11:03:32 +
2009 ---
> This BOTH is what I ment, and for everybody not knowing the story here is
> the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from mhath...@openoffice.org Sat Oct 10 14:49:37
+ 2009 ---
==>fs
you wrote:
Since all our connections are set to AutoCommit=TRUE, this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 9 15:29:29 +
2009 ---
> I did it explain, and you returned that you could catch the point, what else
>
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from mhath...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 9 14:42:33
+ 2009 ---
well Frank
I did it explain, and you returned that you could catch the point
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 9 09:39:42 +
2009 ---
> 1. You changed the behavior of forms
Huh?
> 2. the method setautocommit is st
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from mhath...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 8 18:52:54
+ 2009 ---
==>fs
hm
I did not understood what two different items you are looking for,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 8 13:13:02 +
2009 ---
I don't understand the connection to HSQL which you draw here, sorry.
All in all
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from mhath...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 19 13:53:16
+ 2009 ---
>fs
well, I see that the changes to HSQL 1.9 will cause some problems, alth
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Tue Aug 18 21:05:29 +
2009 ---
3.2 is also illusionary (though not as ridiculous as 3.1.1 - I meant what I said
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from mhath...@openoffice.org Tue Aug 18 15:33:26
+ 2009 ---
well Frank, I guess you did not mean rediculous, although, you are nearly rig
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
User mhatheoo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
User eberlein changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 10 20:09:50 +
2008 ---
=> fs
just re-found this issue, and as code-freeze for OO.o 3.0 was,
I guess the f
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
User mhatheoo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
User jjmckenzie changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
User mhatheoo changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
25 matches
Mail list logo
