To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101222
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101222
User mav changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101222
User mav changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101222
--- Additional comments from t...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 21 11:31:25 +
2009 ---
@mav: Alles klar. I think it good to return S_OK explicitly and remove the
vari
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101222
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 21 06:46:29 +
2009 ---
I will remove the duplicate variable and let S_OK be returned always explicitly.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101222
User mav changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101222
User tono changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101222
Issue #|101222
Summary|return code handling in InprocEmbedDocument_Impl::SetH
|ostNames
Component|framewo