To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from realen...@openoffice.org Sat Feb 27 20:23:06
+ 2010 ---
Does anyone succeeded to run Object Inspector with OO 3.2?
I tried to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 22 10:58:02
+ 2009 ---
@sb: I would think that the classloader set by OOo so far wasn't arbitrary.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from milek...@openoffice.org Sun Sep 20 11:41:47
+ 2009 ---
@mux2005: I cannot confirm that there is any problem with JEditorPane. I'm
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 18 13:20:43
+ 2009 ---
@oj: If I understand you correctly, in the use case you describe a new
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 18 14:22:36 +
2009 ---
@mux2005: a new thread is started for every call: No, it is a single
(native)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 18 16:31:45
+ 2009 ---
I don't think the world will ever be cleaned up. New incorrect uses of the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 18 16:44:01 +
2009 ---
@mux2005: Again, developers that do not understand and do not care about class
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 17 09:19:51
+ 2009 ---
Please reconsider the removal of the classloader setting code. The
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from o...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 17 11:11:59 +
2009 ---
I can't find the numbers but when using the OOo Base the db used is written in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 07:33:38
+ 2009 ---
If in a thread you call code that has requirements on the context class
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Wed Sep 16 12:43:50 +
2009 ---
@mux2005: I could reproduce this with Sun's Java 6u13 and the simple program
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 13:05:31
+ 2009 ---
What's the status of this issue? This is affecting our WollMux extension,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 13:12:34
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64773)
Open attachment, allow macros, press
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from mux2...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 13:52:10
+ 2009 ---
The problem seems to occur only if a Java extension is installed. If I run
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Tue Sep 15 14:37:02 +
2009 ---
@mux2005:
1 fiddling with the classloader of the event dispatching thread
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
User brinzing changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
User milek_pl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
User ms changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
21 matches
Mail list logo