[framework-issues] [Issue 103420] Enable revokation checkin g

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103420 User hi changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[framework-issues] [Issue 103420] Enable revokation checkin g

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103420 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[framework-issues] [Issue 103420] Enable revokation checkin g

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103420 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[framework-issues] [Issue 103420] Enable revokation checkin g

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103420 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[framework-issues] [Issue 103420] Enable revokation checkin g

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103420 --- Additional comments from krayn...@openoffice.org Tue Aug 18 16:45:08 + 2009 --- I suppose Bouncy Castle Crypto API for java

[framework-issues] [Issue 103420] Enable revokation checkin g

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103420 --- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 17 09:15:02 + 2009 --- Thanks for the information. CAdES is indeed very interesting. However, I would

[framework-issues] [Issue 103420] Enable revokation checkin g

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103420 --- Additional comments from krayn...@openoffice.org Sat Aug 15 15:38:42 + 2009 --- By the way have you got any plans to implement trusted timestamping? If

[framework-issues] [Issue 103420] Enable revokation checkin g

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103420 --- Additional comments from krayn...@openoffice.org Tue Aug 11 16:41:20 + 2009 --- Maybe RFC 3852 (part 11.3) will be useful.

[framework-issues] [Issue 103420] Enable revokation checkin g

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103420 --- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 3 09:49:54 + 2009 --- Time stamps are not supported yet. In the end it depends on what algorithm is

[framework-issues] [Issue 103420] Enable revokation checkin g

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103420 --- Additional comments from krayn...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 3 18:57:27 + 2009 --- Maybe another decision exists. The fact is that the OCSP responder must

[framework-issues] [Issue 103420] Enable revokation checkin g

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103420 --- Additional comments from krayn...@openoffice.org Sat Aug 1 09:36:50 + 2009 --- I am sorry for disturbance, but please take into consideration one moment

[framework-issues] [Issue 103420] Enable revokation checkin g

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103420 --- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Wed Jul 22 11:10:37 + 2009 --- *** Issue 63537 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***

[framework-issues] [Issue 103420] Enable revokation checkin g

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103420 User jl changed the following: What|Old value |New value