To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 20 11:13:14 +
2009 ---
OK, thanks. I was confused by your last comment about some places that need to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Thu Nov 19 16:56:16 +
2009 ---
Do I understand correctly: the patch is not sufficient? We still can wait for a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Tue Nov 3 14:51:12 +
2009 ---
Hmm, after doing a nojava build I see 4 places which need to be fixed to get it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 29 11:57:12 +
2009 ---
mba: The time you have used for asking whether this is a stopper could have
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 13:31:19 +
2009 ---
Please let me ask again: do you consider this to be a showstopper for 3.2 or
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
--- Additional comments from er...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 25 11:33:02 +
2009 ---
Brekage confirmed : I do --with-java=no builds, and I'd like to understand why
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Fri Sep 25 11:58:52 +
2009 ---
Thanks, Rene. I assume that the target 3.2 means that we should declare it as a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104338
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
13 matches
Mail list logo