To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 19 01:32:55 -0800
2005 ---
Concerning the entry from Gnome bugzilla: Please note that "the latest version"
is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 18 00:56:48 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 43039 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 17 09:27:51 -0800
2005 ---
I picked up a new copy of m79 and indeed it behaves. I would recommend some
cautio
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
User us changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
User us changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 17 07:46:14 -0800
2005 ---
@singelton: could you a bit more specific, pls.
* What Linux distri are you using?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
User grsingleton changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 17 01:08:33 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 42961 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 11 04:49:34 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 42449 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 00:17:18 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 42362 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 7 23:02:58 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 42246 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
User us changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 4 02:54:23 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 42024 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 4 02:06:09 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 42009 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 4 02:05:08 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 42009 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
User us changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 3 03:33:40 -0800
2005 ---
WORKAROUND:
===
/Tools/Options/OpenOffice.org/General
Mark the CheckBox "U
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 3 02:49:27 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 41929 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
User us changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
User us changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
User us changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
User us changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 31 07:39:31 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 41531 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 29 05:00:25 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 41590 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 06:33:11 -0800
2005 ---
If we install inside OOo, we can not have rpm dependencies to libxml2 in any of
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 06:05:49 -0800
2005 ---
Where would our libxml2 rpm install libxml2.so to ? /usr/lib ? If not, it must
not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 06:05:44 -0800
2005 ---
To avoid confusion: from what I understand the currently preferred solution is
to p
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 05:49:52 -0800
2005 ---
The above sounds all very reasonable to me. And it's very likely that we will
proce
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 04:55:17 -0800
2005 ---
:-), I'd the workspace built so rather than throw it away...
2 looks best to me, i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 04:39:51 -0800
2005 ---
The above table is just a first shot. Probably many aspects are still missing.
Ther
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 04:33:00 -0800
2005 ---
+--+---+---+
| Possible
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 02:41:18 -0800
2005 ---
Adagio...
Sorry should have made that more clearly: we are not yet decided how to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 27 14:01:38 -0800
2005 ---
This is not Fedora only, I can reproduce this with Debian unstable too.
ii libxml2
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 27 02:47:09 -0800
2005 ---
For my builds I've been using libxml2.so.2.6.14 for some time, there are no
inheren
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 27 02:42:18 -0800
2005 ---
Adding owner of libxml2 to list of CC.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 27 02:38:43 -0800
2005 ---
Thanks CMC for the quick response.
Indeed as you suggested copying libxml2.so.2.6.1
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 27 02:19:34 -0800
2005 ---
presumably because the libxml2 included in the OOo build itself is missing
symbols
39 matches
Mail list logo
