[framework-issues] [Issue 46585] sun.misc.* classes are no t "standard"

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 01:09:03 -0700 2005 --- After some discussions at [EMAIL PROTECTED], we discovered that the package xercesI

[framework-issues] [Issue 46585] sun.misc.* classes are no t "standard"

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 User fridrich_strba changed the following: What|Old value |New value =

[framework-issues] [Issue 46585] sun.misc.* classes are no t "standard"

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 3 02:55:09 -0700 2005 --- Tried this patch and with a microscopic modifications, it builds OK with IBM Java S

[framework-issues] [Issue 46585] sun.misc.* classes are no t "standard"

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value =

[framework-issues] [Issue 46585] sun.misc.* classes are no t "standard"

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value =

[framework-issues] [Issue 46585] sun.misc.* classes are no t "standard"

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 2 04:12:52 -0700 2005 --- This patch also did build m120 OK on debian unstable GNU/Linux sparc using gcj4.0/g

[framework-issues] [Issue 46585] sun.misc.* classes are no t "standard"

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 2 02:05:45 -0700 2005 --- No doubt that cmc is knowing what he is doing ;-) Thousands of successful build ins

[framework-issues] [Issue 46585] sun.misc.* classes are no t "standard"

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 2 02:00:22 -0700 2005 --- flr->fridrich_strba: I'm very sorry for not having time to handle this issue. Would

[framework-issues] [Issue 46585] sun.misc.* classes are no t "standard"

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 2 01:48:56 -0700 2005 --- I am planning to create a CWS for IBM JDK/JRE issues once m122 released. Do you thi

[framework-issues] [Issue 46585] sun.misc.* classes are no t "standard"

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 28 05:50:53 -0700 2005 --- flr: can you reproduce the result of your talk in changing the target and/or Resolu

[framework-issues] [Issue 46585] sun.misc.* classes are no t "standard"

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 11 01:57:18 -0700 2005 --- flr->pjanik: I'm sorry, but I suppose I'm currently some kind of bottleneck, which

[framework-issues] [Issue 46585] sun.misc.* classes are no t "standard"

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 8 08:59:51 -0700 2005 --- Can you please update the status of this issue? --