To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 5 10:49:13 -0800
2006 ---
Just FYI, the memory work that you did looks nice in 2.0.1
Sample Session in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
User ja changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
User ja changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 13:50:12 -0700
2005 ---
Still poking at leaks, I had a user today that was up over 400MB of memory and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 2 07:38:40 -0700
2005 ---
M125 is coming in about the same as the last few milestones. Better at leaks,
but
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
User tm changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 11 07:00:11 -0700
2005 ---
Just a reminder that on a multi-user system each little bit of memory that you
get
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
User tm changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 3 12:32:57 -0700
2005 ---
I feel comfortable saying it's slightly better in M122. Below is the stats of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
User mci changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 7 01:53:05 -0700
2005 ---
David - it's rather odd really - with my 110 I see:
VIRT SHRSIZE
111m 82m
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
User tm changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 6 06:53:48 -0700
2005 ---
M113 seems only slightly better. Looks like an initial start of around 140MB of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 6 07:16:51 -0700
2005 ---
mci - ja: Is this something for you?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 6 07:38:27 -0700
2005 ---
JA: in src680m114 the CWS memory01 has been integrated. This CWS contains 9
issues
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 6 10:33:19 -0700
2005 ---
I'll watch for the patches in the next released version and report. Even a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 09:56:29 -0700
2005 ---
M104 is still pretty heavy with memory:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
User drichard changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 11:12:31 -0700
2005 ---
Attached information on users on the OOo 1.1 production server. You can see
that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
User drichard changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 11:16:30 -0700
2005 ---
Added Michael Meeks per his request.
21 matches
Mail list logo