To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
User hi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
User hi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
User cd changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
User cd changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 15 07:48:57 -0800
2007 ---
phantastic! thanks a lot!
so i can expect this in 2.2.1 ?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 15 08:28:39 -0800
2007 ---
cd-minimax: No, you will get the dialog for OOo 2.2. The whole solution from
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 15 09:24:22 -0800
2007 ---
even better, ... the company that i am helping with will upgrade as soon as it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
User cd changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 12 08:03:17 -0800
2007 ---
beppec56-cd: for me it's OK to change the mailmodel for 2.2 target. Can you
take
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 12 08:16:35 -0800
2007 ---
cd-beppec56: Great! Yes, I will do all the changes (target set OOo 2.2).
Could you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 12 09:10:50 -0800
2007 ---
beppec56-cd: will do next week.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 11 00:38:03 -0800
2007 ---
cd-beppec56: The dispatch API is defined to be used by UI code. Therefore you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 11 00:52:58 -0800
2007 ---
is it possible to have the script unfriendly patch in ooo asap and then wait for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 11 01:52:40 -0800
2007 ---
beppec56-cd: my suggestion is as follows:
- go on with this patch as it is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 11 04:05:20 -0800
2007 ---
cd-beppec56: Sure, you can ask questions on the framework dev mailing list.
Please
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 10 07:15:44 -0800
2007 ---
beppec56-cd: I'm going to attach a modified patch:
- m199 based;
- cleaned up to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
User cd changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 9 08:16:30 -0800
2007 ---
beppec56-cd: I added the SFX_CALLMODE_RECORD test because without that test if
you
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
User as changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 30 09:07:37 -0800
2006 ---
Is this moving anywhere?
This is a really important issue for use of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 11 01:01:15 -0700
2006 ---
*** Issue 67124 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64555
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
26 matches
Mail list logo
