To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Jul 28 17:23:45 +
2010 ---
I will take care of this after my vacation
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Nov 11 14:20:52 +
2009 ---
thanks, will have a look
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 6 10:39:14 +
2007 ---
So overall I think we should tackle the problem differently. Caolan, do you
agree
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 6 10:51:09 +
2007 ---
sure, whatever works for you.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 18 11:05:09 +
2007 ---
i.e. have the editengine html parser ctor always call SetEncodingByHTTPHeader.
i.e
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 18 17:06:00 +
2007 ---
Oops, the patch in sw is wrong. Patch corrected.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 18 16:57:22 +
2007 ---
So the latest patch should be the addition that lets the code be executed in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 18 16:58:10 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45227)
Proposed alternative patch from mba
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 18 17:17:45 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=45228)
revised patch
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 18 17:20:30 +
2007 ---
BTW: in case of Writer on Windows the new code wasn't used; Writer used UTF-8
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 18 17:34:38 +
2007 ---
Hmm, isn't it the case that no one will free that returned SvKeyValueIterator*.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 18 17:58:42 +
2007 ---
Deleting should be easy as it can be deleted where it was created (as before in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 14 19:33:10 +
2007 ---
@cmc: can you point me to the code that should call the SFX code you added when
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 25 06:43:11 +
2007 ---
It's impractical for an outside contributer to know who actually *is* the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 25 08:38:07 +
2007 ---
Understood. I recommend to send patches to the project lead of the selected
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 25 10:19:00 +
2007 ---
SetEncodingByHTTPHeader isn't called from EditHTMLParser ctor if there are no
http
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 25 10:33:44 +
2007 ---
Yes, using SfxObjectShell::Current() should be avoided where possible. Perhaps
we
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
Issue #|76649
Summary|sfx2: html parser support for html with missing encodi
|ng
Component|framework
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76649
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
27 matches
Mail list logo