To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 31 10:00:23 +
2008 ---
Here a solution: add following lines in your
ProtocolHandler.dispatch(URL aURL, Pro
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 17 11:55:42 +
2007 ---
@dnaber:
We use
private final URL resourceURL =
this.getClass().getClassLoader().
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 27 20:17:14 +
2007 ---
@sb: we now managed to work around the problem by explicitly putting all JARs
in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 27 16:19:24 +
2007 ---
@dnaber: Maybe the leading slash in "/de/rules/grammar.xml" is your problem?
(Alt
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 25 22:38:13 +
2007 ---
mux2005, my software LanguageTool is also a victim of this bug. Could
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 24 08:12:27 +
2007 ---
So what now? This issue has target set to 2.3... and is STILL UNCONFIRMED.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 22 07:41:13 +
2007 ---
@mux:
2+3: You can easily construct a classloader that has access to the classes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
User kso changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 13 13:04:36 +
2007 ---
@sb:
1. A lot of things that you need to rely on when doing extensive UNO programm
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 7 08:41:54 +
2007 ---
1 It had never been specified that extension jars are put on the classpath.
Exten
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 3 10:38:10 +
2007 ---
AFAIK, it should not be necessary any more to use the class path for extensions.
An
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 3 10:16:52 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=47291)
Outputs the CLASSPATH for OOo's JVM
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
User jsk changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
User jsk changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
User jl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 27 11:59:02 +
2007 ---
I've found a workaround for us. I've changed the constructor of our classloader
lik
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
User mux2005 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=80100
Issue #|80100
Summary|.jar file for extension no longer in CLASSPATH
Component|framework
Version|680m221
24 matches
Mail list logo
