To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 6 14:39:35 +
2007 ---
oops .. s/@sb/@fs/ :-)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 6 14:19:24 +
2007 ---
@sb
cloph found two other breakers in extensions/source/plugin/unx
They are now f
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 6 12:39:49 +
2007 ---
@ericb:
With the above patch, you have two times the code
waitpid( m_nCommPID, &
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 6 12:26:17 +
2007 ---
@fs
Sorry, I'm not sure to get/understand what is duplicated ? You mean in runtime
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 6 12:14:17 +
2007 ---
That works, too, but has the disadvantage of duplicating the waitpid code.
Duplicat
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 4 20:44:06 +
2007 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Maybe I'm wrong, but what about use:
Index: extensions/source
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 4 20:16:17 +
2007 ---
Other than that: you're welcome :)
regarding sw: In m231, the CWS swwarnings has b
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 4 20:14:01 +
2007 ---
Ah
A better fix then would be to keep the original line
pid_t nExit = ...
a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 4 18:57:05 +
2007 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is not finished, but this issue is really great for me: I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 4 18:47:22 +
2007 ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Indeed, use two lines fixes the warning. This is strange, but th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 4 18:09:12 +
2007 ---
for the QA: I suggest you ask in [EMAIL PROTECTED] I will also ask inside the
Hamb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 4 18:07:44 +
2007 ---
The change to macmgr.cxx looks perfectly okay, the change to sysplug.cxx
(1.2.44.2)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 4 16:17:43 +
2007 ---
... I meant Aqua is warning free building extensions (was already building
comphel
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 4 16:14:03 +
2007 ---
I confirm, Aqua build is warning free on Mac OS X. The last test has to be done
bu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 4 15:51:15 +
2007 ---
@sb: thanks for the reminder 8) ( /me bad -> I completely forgot the configure
fl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 4 07:40:33 +
2007 ---
... if you remember to config_office/configure --enable-werror
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 3 20:44:11 +
2007 ---
Eric, you should also remove the "extensions" module from the
MODULES_WITH_WARNINGS
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 3 20:36:58 +
2007 ---
Your change to nfuncs.cxx was correct.
I introduced the NULLs you just removed whi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 3 13:05:47 +
2007 ---
Note: I'm not really sure of the change I did in
extensions/source/plugin/base/nfu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 3 13:03:56 +
2007 ---
After a quick try, I want to thank you everybody who commited all the changes:
thi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 3 11:31:24 +
2007 ---
Done: wae4extensions is resync'ed with m231, solenv and comphelper have been
adde
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 3 11:13:53 +
2007 ---
@all : I'll resync wae4extensions with m231, so please stop commiting until I
conf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 3 04:00:17 +
2007 ---
ericb->fs
I think you are completely right, and add solenv and comphelper modules
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 2 22:05:19 +
2007 ---
If we don't add comphelper, then extensions won't be warning-free: There's a
header
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 2 07:46:37 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 69282 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 1 13:53:06 +
2007 ---
Eric, what about adding comphelper and solenv to the CWS?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 1 13:52:38 +
2007 ---
So, I could not resist
Talked with some people owning some code with remainin
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
User jl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 27 07:54:57 +
2007 ---
Committed my changes to extensions.
Eric, any objections if I continue with some m
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 27 05:43:18 +
2007 ---
Thanks. Am I allowed to add comphelper (my code needs it, see above) and solenv
(fo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 26 21:57:00 +
2007 ---
Done: cws wae4extensions is in new state, task i81612 has been added, and
extensio
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 26 20:51:40 +
2007 ---
Eric, what about promoting the CWS from "planned" to "new"?
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 26 14:53:06 +
2007 ---
The last patch makes the aforementioned sub directories warning free on
unxsoli4.pr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 26 14:51:32 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=48519)
the same sub modules, but now also warning free on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 26 11:39:24 +
2007 ---
the new patch adds warning-freeness to the bibliography sub module, based on
Eric's
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 26 11:37:40 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=48511)
be warning-free in abpilot, bibliography, dbpilots
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 26 11:26:49 +
2007 ---
@pjanik:
> I wonder who wrote original here, because there are 10+ times the same
>
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 26 10:06:27 +
2007 ---
allow me to comment the WaE_extensions4.diff patch (some of this has been sad by
Pa
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 26 09:39:34 +
2007 ---
second patch makes mentioned modules warning-free on unxlngi6/.pro, too
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 26 09:35:58 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=48507)
make fs' sub modules in extensions/source warning-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 26 08:41:43 +
2007 ---
With the attached patch, abpilot, dbpilots, propctrlr compile without warning on
wn
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 18 06:18:16 +
2007 ---
I'd volunteer to do the warning-freeness for propctrlr, dbpilots, abpilot,
logging
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
User fs changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 16 07:17:10 +
2007 ---
Thansk to Pavel Janik and Michael Sicotte for some precious advices :)
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 16 07:16:19 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=48255)
initial log (all warnings inside)
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
User ericb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81612
Issue #|81612
Summary|WaE in extensions
Component|framework
Version|680m228
Platform|Macintosh
58 matches
Mail list logo