To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
O
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 21 17:15:19 +
2009 ---
The code doesn not check for UCPs, it just checks protocol handlers. So "file:"
s
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 21 16:16:55 +
2009 ---
That's fine by me, should give consistent behaviour. In my own case it should
mea
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 20 16:13:47 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=59531)
patch using protocol handler configuration
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Tue Jan 20 16:12:12 +
2009 ---
Here's a patch that implements the usage of the protocol handler.
Caolan, would t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from m...@openoffice.org Mon Jan 12 11:56:06 +
2009 ---
It seems that checking the ProtocolHandler service for registered protocols
inste
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 5 15:23:14 +
2008 ---
Thinking a bit further: "vnd.sun.star.help" isn't the only internal protocol we
hav
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 4 16:44:24 +
2008 ---
Yeah, otherwise works fine on the type of urls I care about anyway
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 4 16:14:28 +
2008 ---
Oh yes, but that can be added easily. The question is: does that solve your
problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 4 10:27:29 +
2008 ---
Start Help and click on something. Given just this patch then for me help links
wou
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 3 17:05:18 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=58473)
smaller patch from mba
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 3 17:04:09 +
2008 ---
So now back to work. :-)
To make the changes smaller I would like to propose the c
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 8 09:10:30 +
2008 ---
The reason why we used white listing is that the list of "internal" protocols
that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 24 07:37:12 +
2008 ---
Yes, your idea is right in general. The "design" of that function was made
before w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 23 13:21:13 +
2008 ---
I wonder whether the more frequent use of "IsSecureURL" now might lead to
problems,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 11 12:32:22 +
2008 ---
Oh no hurry at all
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
User mba changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 11 07:54:43 +
2008 ---
"What might break is the case of urls ... now getting passed to
FOO-open-url first
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 27 19:23:41 +
2008 ---
I'm not sure that the situation wrt. anything opened through the existing
whitelist
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 27 18:48:05 +
2008 ---
The patch might cause problems as the code in appopen.cxx also is used for
hyperlin
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=87490
Issue #|87490
Summary|sfx2: http|ftp|https|file hyperlinks treated different
| than e.g. smb
Component|fra
29 matches
Mail list logo