To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
User mmp changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 6 19:13:48 +
2008 ---
Hi guys,
I think this one is simple too old for being recognized, and , as far as
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 6 18:06:33 +
2008 ---
No, I think the version is describing the first version where the problem
appeared
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 3 07:25:50 +
2008 ---
I just realized that under "Version" it still says "OOo 1.1". Might that be a
reaso
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 2 23:22:51 +
2008 ---
This appears to still be an issue with 2.4. It is clearly a bug because the
behavio
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 20 10:49:56 +
2007 ---
Almost four years have passed and no one at sun has even commented on this
issue :
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 25 16:55:45 +
2007 ---
Gack...
now, what is this ? OpenOffice 2.3 is available, with many fixes, also for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 16:37:28 +
2007 ---
Hi,
regarding my comments on pdfcrop: this seems to be a ghostscript bug on my
sy
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
User nick_08150 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
User bh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 15:38:04 +
2007 ---
Hi again,
I just noticed that this issue is marked as "feature" - shouldn't it be
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 15:23:42 +
2007 ---
Hi,
unfortunately this does not work for me: first, gs fails to compute the
bound
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 11 13:37:33 +
2007 ---
For the latex-users:
There is a tool called pdfcrop which fixes the bounding box:
h
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 28 18:22:41 +
2007 ---
I wholeheartedly agree, especially since both workarounds are not 100%: the
macro
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 28 10:17:52 +
2007 ---
I agree, it is very strange that this bug has not yet been fixed.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 28 09:49:33 +
2007 ---
I just read the release notes for OOorg 2.2rc4, and there is still no mention of
fi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 7 09:34:43 -0800
2007 ---
> this issue was reported February 2004 with OO 1.1, and now its 2007 and there
> i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 7 09:12:46 -0800
2007 ---
Hi,
I am also looking forward for a solution for this issue as I am using OOdraw
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
User hcostelha changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
User beppec56 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 8 05:33:08 -0700
2006 ---
I am also frequenlty use Openoffice for creating pdf figures that are used with
pdf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 6 08:07:19 -0800
2006 ---
OO Draw is also my favorite for drawing block diagrams, more comfortable than
Power
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
User frank7 changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 18 09:24:33 -0700
2005 ---
Please vote for this issue.
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 05:09:52 -0700
2005 ---
I don't see what kind of scenarii you think of...
In addition, I found that when p
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 13:09:10 -0700
2005 ---
I definitely agree, although I could think of scenarios, where it might be
convenie
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 10 10:45:34 -0700
2005 ---
I don't know why the bounding box feature isn't yet available in Draw. In my
opinio
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 2 03:27:29 -0700
2005 ---
Having this feature would help me and 7 other persons at the institute where I
wo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 22 01:32:48 -0700
2005 ---
This is indeed about the same behaviour as described in bug #23138. I didn't see
it
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=25341
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 5 21:14:28 -0800
2005 ---
This seems to relate to bug #23138 (dates back to December 2003)
-
30 matches
Mail list logo