To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56520
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 28 08:27:13 -0800
2006 ---
@volkov_peter: probably not, can't tell without actually fixing it. And no need
to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56520
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 28 08:16:14 -0800
2006 ---
Another small bump. :) I can reproduce this in oob680.1.0.
I thought this issue is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56520
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 26 23:33:25 -0800
2005 ---
Small bump. This is still an issue...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56520
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 31 00:51:57 -0700
2005 ---
*** Issue 56872 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56520
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 24 01:32:06 -0700
2005 ---
Confirmed. The metafile renderer simply ignores the OutDev's textLineColor for
unde
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56520
User wg changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56520
User volkov_peter changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===