To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
User kla changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
User kla changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
User iha changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 10 14:08:12 +
2007 ---
Thanks a lot. I changed the code back to the mathematically correct behavior.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 10 13:55:23 +
2007 ---
I looked again and found, that allowing fMaxCurveparam=0 leads to fCurveStep=0.
Th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 10 13:27:48 +
2007 ---
hm, I enter the loop and get more than one output point, but when this all is
wrong
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 10 12:54:35 +
2007 ---
I think mathematically it is not valid. If you have n=2 and k=4 for example
(2+n-k=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
User iha changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 9 16:52:21 +
2007 ---
Oh, I just see that I have forgotten to erase the function "BSPoint" which is no
lo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 9 16:45:37 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46656)
new way to calculate BSplines
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 9 16:46:21 +
2007 ---
Created an attachment (id=46657)
example charts
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
User regina changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
User tonygalmiche changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
User kla changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=72216
Issue #|72216
Summary|in XY chart do not sort x-values for B-splines
Component|Chart
Version|OOo 2.1
15 matches
Mail list logo