To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
User gghh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
User af changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
User af changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
User liangweike changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 22 08:28:03 +
2008 ---
->liangweike: after a call to ReplaceObject(), pOldObj will no longer be part of
th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 22 03:00:14 +
2008 ---
->cl: Thank you for your explanation. However, based on my investigation
ReplaceOb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 21 09:48:36 +
2008 ---
whatever the cause of this bug is, the given patch is not valid.
The line
pOL->Re
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 21 07:47:57 +
2008 ---
As soon as the CWS gets into status "ready for QA" I will test it...
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 21 01:21:28 +
2008 ---
And I've already committed the patch to CWS impress137. Please check and test
it.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 20 10:28:55 +
2008 ---
No, Ido no thinks so. This is a defect in the named CWS and it should be handled
th
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
User pagalmes changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
User liangweike changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
User liangweike changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
User liangweike changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84984
Issue #|84984
Summary|impress137: crash when using graphic filters on bmp
Component|Drawing
Version|680m237
15 matches
Mail list logo