To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
User cornouws changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 25 09:28:17 +
2008 ---
With the changes I have made for issue 93945 and issue 94193, the animations
look a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
User cl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 24 15:54:33 +
2008 ---
2.2: Acceptible, smooth performance, moving objects end up at the right
locations.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
User thb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 24 15:17:40 +
2008 ---
With OOo 3.0 the graphics performance has detoriated further. Even with the
"Slides
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 2 19:41:32 +
2008 ---
@thb: correct: I can't say the regression I see is serious. But since the
performan
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 2 19:20:15 +
2008 ---
@cornouws: If I get you right, you don't see a "serious regression" in graphics
per
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 2 15:39:17 +
2008 ---
@thorsten: Yes, but not severe - setting the ZOrder-prop to false doesn't make
much
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 1 22:14:29 +
2008 ---
@cornouws: you experience this as well?
at any rate, fixing this for 3.0 is pretty
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 1 21:58:42 +
2008 ---
Sorry I have to complain, but 3.x ...
I'dd rather not advice the managers/executive
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
User cgu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
User cgu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
User cornouws changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 14 17:40:31 +
2008 ---
No, it is independent of the new Zorder hack.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 14 15:12:16 +
2008 ---
@jvromans: is this affected by the respectZorder setting?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 14 10:45:54 +
2008 ---
@@all: can somebody else confirm this on ATI hardware?
I see the same behaviour on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 11 14:17:58 +
2008 ---
@jvromans: nope, this feature was not implemented to speed things up, but to
displa
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 11 10:09:44 +
2008 ---
Thanks for the explanation. The way you describe it, this feature seems to be
inten
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 11 08:22:16 +
2008 ---
@jvromans: sorry, not wanting to leave you in the dark. Quote from Impress.xcs:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 10 19:30:31 +
2008 ---
And the rest is silence...
What does this SlideshowRespectZOrder property do?
Why w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 7 11:34:16 +
2008 ---
Yes, this fixes the problems on 2.3 and 2.4!
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 7 10:54:17 +
2008 ---
hm. might be that CWS presfixes12 caused this. please refer to issue 75315 on
how t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
User thb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
User aziem changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 6 18:14:26 +
2008 ---
Correction: I looked another time and in 00o 2.4 as well, the "customer" bubble
win
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
User simonbr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 6 14:48:41 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=50680)
Demo presentation with some graphics.
--
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85029
Issue #|85029
Summary|Serious regression in graphics performance
Component|Presentation
Version|OOo 2.3.1
29 matches
Mail list logo