To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 31 22:48:53 -0800
2006 ---
> libfreetypes [...some suggestions snipped that might get people in legal
trouble.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 31 05:04:03 -0800
2006 ---
> Well, currently we always install libfreetype, but into the filter
> sub-directo
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 31 05:29:20 -0800
2006 ---
I think most of the LD_LIBRARY_PATH stuff is only still there because nobody
dares
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
User obr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 4 01:56:03 -0700
2006 ---
My preference would still be not to ship libfreetype at all, but what are the
drawb
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 26 01:37:07 -0700
2006 ---
urgh; when I said fontconfig, I meant 'freetype' (of course ;-). We already
dlopen
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 26 01:38:11 -0700
2006 ---
urgh; when I said fontconfig, I meant 'freetype' (of course ;-). We already
dlopen
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 25 02:41:57 -0700
2006 ---
simonbr:
> So would it be a good idea to reopen this issue?
This issue is open
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
User simonbr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 13 01:34:27 -0700
2006 ---
> what did 109927 say?
Something along the lines of issue 52025 and issue 52026. I
17 matches
Mail list logo
