To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Jan 20 23:30:19 +
2010 ---
we discussed this a bit on IRC the last days; indeed caolans first
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Fri Jan 8 13:07:21 +
2010 ---
cmc: yes, actually it is a vanilla STLport 4.6 -
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 7 12:44:23 +
2010 ---
You've a different stlport than the vanilla one.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Mon Jan 4 15:20:57 +
2010 ---
Tried this version successfully on debian squeeze with gcc-4.1, gcc-4.3 and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jan 4 21:51:07 +
2010 ---
cmc: just tried it. Still fails:
$ g++-4.4 -v
Using built-in specs.
Target:
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jan 4 21:51:53 +
2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=66982)
buildlog from failed vcl build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jan 4 21:54:59 +
2010 ---
cmc: oh, wait...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jan 4 21:59:04 +
2010 ---
cmc: nevermind, forgot to update the pregraphite.h patch header when merging
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jan 4 22:32:18 +
2010 ---
cmc: ok, still fails
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Mon Jan 4 22:33:06 +
2010 ---
Created an attachment (id=66983)
real build failure
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Fri Nov 20 13:49:24 +
2009 ---
hmm, a fresh debootstrap lenny with gcc 4:4.3.2 and vanilla sources + this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 22 07:59:14 +
2009 ---
thanks for that idea, I currently use external graphite everywhere escept on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 22 09:06:00 +
2009 ---
Admittedly very fragile, adding a
#undef _STLP_CASSERT to pregraphitestl.h and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 22 09:37:44 +
2009 ---
cmc: http://zyklop.dyndns.org/~rene/g++-h.log
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
Issue #|106157
Summary|vcl: thoughts on a system graphite for x86 where we bu
|ild with stlport
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106157
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
22 matches
Mail list logo
