To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from wur...@openoffice.org Sun Jan 9 13:50:24
+ 2011 ---
Hi all,
Did this CWS finally get integrated or not ? From the EIS link posted
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 9 08:31:10 +
2010 ---
*** Issue 37991 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 22 14:43:26 +
2009 ---
See followup issue 107831 for support of the deprecated SEAC operator in PS-OTF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 21 20:55:18 +
2009 ---
Congratulations, this very useful feature is really neccessary!
But I've done a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 21 20:57:27 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=66754)
Missing i und ä in exported PDF.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Fri Dec 18 08:16:00 +
2009 ---
*** Issue 107759 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Thu Dec 17 16:05:30 +
2009 ---
The PS-OTF kerning issue persists in OOO320m8 (OOo 3.2.0-rc1) in Linux; see also
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Thu Dec 17 16:07:51 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=66695)
I prepared a Writer document using different
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Thu Dec 17 16:10:24 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=66697)
The document converted to PDF using OOo PDF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Thu Dec 17 16:13:36 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=66698)
Here, for comparison purposes, I substituted
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User galionlibrary changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 24 09:35:19 +
2009 ---
@jurf: login there...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from hussn...@openoffice.org Sun Aug 23 13:34:15
+ 2009 ---
otf fonts in arabic/urdu fonts using otf features are still not beeing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Sun Aug 23 14:22:05 +
2009 ---
@hussnain: Cannot confirm.
On vista, I installed the Urdu fonts mentioned in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from j...@openoffice.org Sat Aug 22 22:57:25 +
2009 ---
Verified in Win XP - congratulations!
Tested with Iwona, TeXGyre fonts, Yanone
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 06:14:00 +
2009 ---
[...] kerning problem [...]
Using the provided sample document I didn't see
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 11:13:25 +
2009 ---
Sorry: but the mentioned problems with Kerning and Spacing are not related to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 11:43:24 +
2009 ---
Sorry again :-)
Kerning and Space-condencing-expanding works fine only Character
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 11:44:26 +
2009 ---
Sorry again :-)
Kerning and Space-condencing-expanding works fine only Character
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 11:46:30 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64297)
Make a PDF to see the spacing problems
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 11:48:22 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64298)
Make a PDF to see the spacing problems
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 12:11:15 +
2009 ---
Font Width follows the OO-percentages but the spaces stays at 100%
That's
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User es changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 12:39:41 +
2009 ---
Hi!
I am QA Representative for the the CWS otf01.
We decided make this CWS
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 13:34:54 +
2009 ---
Not sure if this must be discussed here or elsewhere... The otf support on this
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 13:53:09 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64268)
In the attached image the top string is from
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 14:31:54 +
2009 ---
The issue with the optional OpenType features is already tracked in issue
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 14:54:49 +
2009 ---
Type 1 subsets are OK sinds Adobe do's the same thing and thats still the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 15:00:45 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64269)
odf for Professional Printing after PDF shows
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from fo...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 17:19:08 +
2009 ---
I'm sorry to say it, but in the Mac version (OOo 3.2.0 / DEV300m55 / Build 9418
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 17:40:39 +
2009 ---
@foniq
I did not mentioned Layout but Professional Printing like Books and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from feros...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 17:53:52
+ 2009 ---
Good results under Ubuntu 9.04 and OOo Build 9418. OTFs are seen fine on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 17:54:52 +
2009 ---
To ALL: PLEASE READ:
The meaning of providing install set before integration
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 18:34:18 +
2009 ---
(apart from the currently discussed kerning problems...)
Compared 3.1 and CWS
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from fo...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 18:40:54 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64280)
sample of faulty PDF export in OOo 3.2.0 Build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from fo...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 18:44:47 +
2009 ---
@es
ok. here we go:
• OS 10.5.8 (intel Mac)
• a random selection of OpenType
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 18:52:16 +
2009 ---
[...] in the Mac version [...] DEV300m55 [...] nothing is fixed
Please see
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 19:08:14 +
2009 ---
@HDU: please confirm that the not yet confirmed kerning problem might be an
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from feros...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 20:13:09
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64283)
Example that works under Ubuntu 9.04
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from feros...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 20:15:11
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64284)
Example that works under Ubuntu 9.04
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from feros...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 20:17:55
+ 2009 ---
Testing 3 fonts used by foniq under Ubuntu 9.04 I had no problems on screen
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from oi...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 00:35:34 +
2009 ---
On Mac OS X 10.5.8, with the test build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from oi...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 00:36:56 +
2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=64285)
Screenshot illustrating errors in full
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from oi...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 00:50:11 +
2009 ---
OK, scratch that, make that *any* Type1 font I try gets turned into garbage in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 00:59:42 +
2009 ---
@oikoi, you said:
*full justification* appears to be disabled or faulty, *not
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from feros...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 19 15:45:03
+ 2009 ---
Great news!!! I would like to test it. Could you please confirm the version
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from aube...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 19 17:33:57
+ 2009 ---
@ferrosan:
read the release notes here
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 5 09:20:48 +
2009 ---
*** Issue 104011 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from hussn...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 5 23:43:30
+ 2009 ---
regaring issue nr. 104011 i have exported the file with OO DEV300m53 (Build
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from hussn...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 6 00:29:12
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=63976)
issue 104011: document of oo 2.1.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from hussn...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 6 00:31:17
+ 2009 ---
Created an attachment (id=63977)
issue 104011: document of oo 2.1.0 (correct
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from xavier_ro...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 8
15:11:22 + 2009 ---
Je cherchais justement comment obtenir cette possibilité. Dommage que ce
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Mon May 18 11:10:11 +
2009 ---
Childworkspace otf01 looks good for a OOo 3.2 target.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User awagner_mainz changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User scottchiefbaker changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from ou...@openoffice.org Thu May 7 20:16:23 +
2009 ---
Since version 3.1 has already been released, the next stable version 3.2 will
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User arielch changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 2 09:59:34 +
2009 ---
Looks good for 3.2... unless other high priorities like the Mac-Port,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from soft...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 2 10:41:22
+ 2009 ---
Big hads hdu ;-)
This sounds really good. This issue is too old in order
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from ou...@openoffice.org Sat Feb 28 13:14:46 +
2009 ---
This issue is already 4yo (although the issue 16032 will be 6yo this June, so
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from john_jason_jor...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 27
18:32:27 + 2009 ---
I just noticed that using OpenType fonts with PostScript outlines
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User ceplm changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 13 04:08:48 +
2008 ---
You were mentioned on /., BTW:
http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/10/11/227236.shtml
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 6 22:19:58 +
2008 ---
Support for OTF (with CFF) is a must. Hope soon have some certain good news
about
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User ousia changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 25 16:59:51 +
2008 ---
vga, Can I download and install XeTeX into my Linux, and after this I would use
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 26 03:36:43 +
2008 ---
@lcdsantos,
What XeTeX can and cannot do is independent of what OOo can and
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 21 01:42:58 +
2008 ---
I'm glad to see work on this issue has started. I just put money down for a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 8 22:03:31 +
2008 ---
Yes, very glad to see this getting worked on. Thanks very much to everyone
helping
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 9 01:19:34 +
2008 ---
Unless I'm mistaken, OOo is using ICU. There's a TeX derivative called XeTeX
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User chrullrich changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 25 06:35:22 +
2008 ---
Big thanks for finally announcing a target milestone ;-)
My vote for OOo-3.1,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 25 14:25:48 +
2008 ---
Thanks for announcing the milestone, hdu! Thanks to all the dev's, etc. who are
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 24 13:03:41 +
2008 ---
After some discussion, the consensus Fedora-side seems to be that shipping
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 24 14:16:29 +
2008 ---
Thank you for the status update!
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User bernd_schoeler changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 27 13:21:05 +
2008 ---
Exporting an Impress file with ArnoPro font but PDF shows a cracky Arial after
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 22 23:47:27 +
2008 ---
I reported this to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Friday,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 13:47:39 +
2008 ---
As already said, neither changing this issue's type from “Enhancement” to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 16 13:54:39 +
2008 ---
I subscribed to the list, at
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User ousia changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 11 03:10:34 +
2008 ---
So how do we users go about raising the priority of this issue to P2?
I've had
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 8 20:02:21 +
2008 ---
The real point is not if it fits the definition of defect. It is, instead, the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 6 19:58:56 +
2008 ---
I agree with burmashave: I too do not understand why this issue has not been
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 2 16:58:35 +
2008 ---
I am generally very patient with open source projects; however, I am
increasingly
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User nmailhot changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User msundman changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 17:40:37 +
2008 ---
PDF export and printing of PostScript fonts would be an interesting feature to
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 23:43:11 +
2008 ---
mbayer-ousia: As you can deduce from this issue's target milestone “OOo Later”,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 14 09:29:11 +
2008 ---
@nmailhot: Fedora is replacing its Type1 fonts by their CFF-OTF counterparts?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
User jeongkyu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 14 13:18:11 +
2008 ---
hdu @nmailhot: Fedora is replacing its Type1 fonts by their CFF-OTF
counterparts?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 14 14:01:30 +
2008 ---
I had a closer look at the PS export and especially its font
handling. For CFF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 11 09:31:02 +
2008 ---
Yes. It's much more important than most of other bugs. Much times, I have
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 11 11:40:12 +
2008 ---
Although I also think that the current situation is unsatisfying, I want to
remind
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
