To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52026
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 18 02:26:13 -0700
2006 ---
This is related to #65521# - wrt. static linking of this internal version.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52026
User is changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52026
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 22 07:10:25 -0700
2005 ---
> If we make libfreetype a runtime prerequisite, shouldn't it be
> explicitly menti
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52026
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 13:02:48 -0700
2005 ---
Herbert, there are still some open questions:
If we make libfreetype a runtime pre
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52026
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 18 07:51:00 -0700
2005 ---
Whether it can be treated as a runtime prerequisite should be handled by
packaging
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52026
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
