[gsl-issues] [Issue 84571] Slackware doinst.sh: proce ss \n

2008-02-26 Thread obr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84571 User obr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 84571] Slackware doinst.sh: proce ss \n

2008-02-07 Thread hjs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84571 User hjs changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 84571] Slackware doinst.sh: proce ss \n

2008-02-06 Thread cloph
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84571 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 6 19:11:01 + 2008 --- thanks for grabbing that issue - I totally missed it (feel free to ping me on IRC w

[gsl-issues] [Issue 84571] Slackware doinst.sh: proce ss \n

2008-02-03 Thread obr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84571 User obr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 84571] Slackware doinst.sh: proce ss \n

2008-01-30 Thread obr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84571 User obr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 84571] Slackware doinst.sh: proce ss \n

2008-01-29 Thread hjs
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84571 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 29 15:27:55 + 2008 --- what about -- .IF "$(USE_SHELL)"=="bash" ECHOPARAM=-e .ENDIF e

[gsl-issues] [Issue 84571] Slackware doinst.sh: proce ss \n

2008-01-29 Thread bormant
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84571 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 29 14:26:30 + 2008 --- obr, is this works on tcsh? How about to use different $ECHOCMD on shells? ECHOCMD

[gsl-issues] [Issue 84571] Slackware doinst.sh: proce ss \n

2008-01-29 Thread obr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84571 User obr changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 84571] Slackware doinst.sh: proce ss \n

2008-01-29 Thread pl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84571 User pl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 84571] Slackware doinst.sh: proce ss \n

2008-01-23 Thread pl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84571 User pl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 84571] Slackware doinst.sh: proce ss \n

2007-12-17 Thread rail
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84571 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 17 11:36:55 + 2007 --- My fault, the patch should be processed with -R parameter. :)

[gsl-issues] [Issue 84571] Slackware doinst.sh: proce ss \n

2007-12-17 Thread pl
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84571 User pl changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 84571] Slackware doinst.sh: proce ss \n

2007-12-14 Thread rail
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84571 User rail changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[gsl-issues] [Issue 84571] Slackware doinst.sh: proce ss \n

2007-12-14 Thread rail
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84571 Issue #|84571 Summary|Slackware doinst.sh: process \n Component|gsl Version|OOo 2.3.1 RC1 Platfor