To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 24 06:13:39 -0700
2006 ---
is: also note that your argumentation doesn't fit here anyway. Because
from 2.0.3 t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 11 02:03:50 -0700
2006 ---
But perhaps it is an advantage that we can update single packages. This could be
in
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 9 14:25:51 -0700
2006 ---
> Installing with "rpm -U" rpm can say that it will not install package ABC,
> bec
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 9 05:36:15 -0700
2006 ---
is: yes. But rpm does have a option allowing to overwrite "old" files, doesn't
it?
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 9 02:50:45 -0700
2006 ---
I agree that it would be better to have all resource files in package core-08.
Neve
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252
User rene changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252
Issue #|68252
Summary|.res file installation inconsistent
Component|Installation
Version|OOo 2.0.3
11 matches
Mail list logo