[installation-issues] [Issue 68252] .res file installation inc onsistent

2007-02-14 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[installation-issues] [Issue 68252] .res file installation inc onsistent

2006-08-24 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 24 06:13:39 -0700 2006 --- is: also note that your argumentation doesn't fit here anyway. Because from 2.0.3 t

[installation-issues] [Issue 68252] .res file installation inc onsistent

2006-08-11 Thread is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 11 02:03:50 -0700 2006 --- But perhaps it is an advantage that we can update single packages. This could be in

[installation-issues] [Issue 68252] .res file installation inc onsistent

2006-08-09 Thread cloph
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 9 14:25:51 -0700 2006 --- > Installing with "rpm -U" rpm can say that it will not install package ABC, > bec

[installation-issues] [Issue 68252] .res file installation inc onsistent

2006-08-09 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 9 05:36:15 -0700 2006 --- is: yes. But rpm does have a option allowing to overwrite "old" files, doesn't it?

[installation-issues] [Issue 68252] .res file installation inc onsistent

2006-08-09 Thread is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 9 02:50:45 -0700 2006 --- I agree that it would be better to have all resource files in package core-08. Neve

[installation-issues] [Issue 68252] .res file installation inc onsistent

2006-08-09 Thread of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252 User of changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[installation-issues] [Issue 68252] .res file installation inc onsistent

2006-08-08 Thread of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252 User of changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[installation-issues] [Issue 68252] .res file installation inc onsistent

2006-08-08 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252 User rene changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[installation-issues] [Issue 68252] .res file installation inc onsistent

2006-08-08 Thread of
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252 User of changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[installation-issues] [Issue 68252] .res file installation inc onsistent

2006-08-08 Thread rene
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68252 Issue #|68252 Summary|.res file installation inconsistent Component|Installation Version|OOo 2.0.3