To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
User hr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
User hr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 18 08:57:19 +
2007 ---
On a general note: We shouldn't introduce new CPAN modules for things we can
easily
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
User tml changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
User vq changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
User is changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 22 07:31:30 -0700
2006 ---
On a related topic, we could also just use the Win32::Guidgen module to generate
UU
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
User davidfraser changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
===
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 19 10:14:32 -0700
2006 ---
> Surely you know that a problem with the hangs are (were, they are gone now for
>
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 19 09:44:03 -0700
2006 ---
Well, when using Filesys::CygwinPaths you aren't using *binaries* from 2003,
that w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 19 07:50:21 -0700
2006 ---
> But on the other hand, so is Cygwin itself, more or less ;) It seems to be
> mor
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 19 07:05:14 -0700
2006 ---
Yes, I agree that the Filesys::CygwinPaths package does seem to be unmaintained.
Bu
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 19 06:05:50 -0700
2006 ---
I'm a little bit scared, the package
http://search.cpan.org/~somian/Filesys-Cygwin
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
User tml changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69671
Issue #|69671
Summary|Instead of spawning cygpath -w, just use Filesys::Cygw
|inPaths::win32path()
Compone
18 matches
Mail list logo