To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=52807
                  Issue #:|52807
                  Summary:|rpm -U deforms the link in /etc
                Component:|Installation
                  Version:|680m118
                 Platform:|All
                      URL:|
               OS/Version:|Linux
                   Status:|NEW
        Status whiteboard:|
                 Keywords:|
               Resolution:|
               Issue type:|DEFECT
                 Priority:|P3
             Subcomponent:|code
              Assigned to:|obr
              Reported by:|obr





------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug  2 22:13:56 -0700 
2005 -------
The trigger script, which runs when the core01 package is installed, has two
problems when running an update:

1. It deforms the link in /etc on RH 9 and FC 1
2. It produces error messages on SuSE 9.2

The reason for #1 is the number of instances of *-core01 at the moment the
script runs when updating: there are two, so the query returns 
/opt/openoffice.org-1.9
/opt/opeonffice.org-1.9
which get concatinated leading to a broken symlink.

The reason for #2 seems to be the 2>&1 redirection, leading to the RPM lock
warning to appear in the ln command line.

Unfortunatly I still have no clue why some RPM versions block until they get the
database lock while others return with an error code :-(.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to