To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 27 17:15:30 -0800
2006 ---
I hadn't time to test in Fedora and delayed the comment, only now I've seen the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 18 08:56:36 -0800
2006 ---
Fix verified in RedHat/Fedora (FC3). I used the packages sent to [EMAIL
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 2 18:06:38 -0800
2006 ---
Verified in the CWS cloph02 for Debian.
The other distros will be tested soon.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 13:35:21 -0800
2005 ---
@obr: Since I guess you're busy with other things, shall I try to find someone
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 07:32:32 -0800
2005 ---
@obr: Since I guess you're busy with other things, shall I try to find someone
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 13 23:09:32 -0800
2005 ---
The solaris stuff is still on GNOME 2.0 level. Updating this one for OpenSolaris
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 12 11:41:44 -0800
2005 ---
committed the changes to the
* debian
* freedesktop
* redhat
* suse
packages,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 20 14:33:38 -0800
2005 ---
Hmm, does gnome-panel pick up the updated icon cache immediately ?
Don't know.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 20 22:51:31 -0800
2005 ---
I cannot see why there should be a special effect on multi-user machines,
Oh, I
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 18 02:49:02 -0800
2005 ---
Hmm, does gnome-panel pick up the updated icon cache immediately ? If so, I
would
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 17 05:33:56 -0800
2005 ---
Hmm, then I don't understand why the trigger doesn't run. Which version of rpm
are
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 17 06:26:11 -0800
2005 ---
Besides what has been said already, I think this is a bug in gnome-panel as
well.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 17 07:20:15 -0800
2005 ---
Tell that maintainer that he doesn't know how triggers work in RPM. And ask him
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 17 07:57:15 -0800
2005 ---
So we have a conclusion, right?
yes.
As you (cloph) saw this issue could be a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 17 09:04:46 -0800
2005 ---
rpm -e openoffice.org-freedesktop-menus
gtk-update-icon-cache
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 17 11:00:18 -0800
2005 ---
Just to avoid any misunderstandings.
Did you get the message that
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 17 13:24:51 -0800
2005 ---
Did you get the message that gtk-update-icon-cache could successfully create
the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
User obr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 14:47:39 -0800
2005 ---
jorgeu: are you installing the RPMs or do you convert the to tgz somehow - I am
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 15:49:06 -0800
2005 ---
1st you shouldn't need (or use) --nodeps to install
2nd the extension for the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 15:54:24 -0800
2005 ---
I installed using $ rpm --nodeps
Hmm, then I don't understand why the trigger
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
User st changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=57871
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
30 matches
Mail list logo