To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 27 13:17:40 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 63680 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 1 12:54:52 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 62690 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
User andreschnabel changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 9 15:42:28 -0800
2006 ---
may I asked what is wrong with the attached patch?
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
User hr changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 3 00:23:17 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 61548 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 17 10:50:16 -0800
2006 ---
with 36 votes, 8 duplicates and a proposed patch it would really make sense to
set
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 17 10:00:38 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 60710 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 15 11:30:31 -0800
2006 ---
*** Issue 60581 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 29 08:01:38 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 59880 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 28 13:52:34 -0800
2005 ---
I would like to see both the opening splash screen and the Help About screen
promi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 28 00:27:36 -0800
2005 ---
this seems to be a subset of issue 11465, so maybe we can set that issue to
depend
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 07:42:54 -0800
2005 ---
But not on the top of every window, as you wrote. That is nonsense.
You may be rig
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 06:20:09 -0800
2005 ---
It's not nonsense, it makes perfect sense. The user should always be concious
of w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 05:04:23 -0800
2005 ---
Thats IMO nonsense.
It's enough, when the full version number ( 2.01 instead of 2.0
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 23 01:00:25 -0800
2005 ---
The version number was far more visible in 1.x. It was on the top of each
window.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 22 16:06:25 -0800
2005 ---
I have to agree. the full version number should be easy to find.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 22 12:28:19 -0800
2005 ---
I don't think that Martin will fix the issue. Let me add Peter ot the CC list...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 22 02:51:21 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 59668 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 20 08:51:56 -0800
2005 ---
I believe this should have been a stopper, as there is now the potential for
confus
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 17 09:40:57 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 58571 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 07:03:36 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 59178 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 07:01:24 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 59178 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 9 13:17:03 -0800
2005 ---
*** Issue 59131 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
User mh changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 4 08:52:02 -0800
2005 ---
No, Staroffice doesn't. You must use ctrl s-d-t to show this info.
andreschnabel i
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=58850
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 4 07:34:43 -0800
2005 ---
This is surely not stopper.
But, yes, we should adopt About to contain the accurat
33 matches
Mail list logo