To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 26 02:31:09 -0800
2007 ---
OF: Looks good for me in OOo2.2 OOFm3
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
User is changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
User pb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
User is changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 6 03:42:25 -0800
2006 ---
Don't mix this up please. This are several issues. The difference between
ProductVe
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 6 03:01:16 -0800
2006 ---
> We have an OpenOffice.org version 2.1 and
> require a packageversion 2.1.0. That
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 6 02:13:35 -0800
2006 ---
Well, that is all your opinion. We have an OpenOffice.org version 2.1 and
require a
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 3 13:57:37 -0800
2006 ---
> PackageVersion is the version of the (unix) packages. Therefore we introduced
>
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 31 07:40:27 -0800
2006 ---
PackageVersion is the version of the (unix) packages. Therefore we introduced a
thr
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 31 05:29:28 -0800
2006 ---
More simple question reduced to the minumum:
Why don't you set PACKAGEVERSION in op
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 30 04:10:51 -0800
2006 ---
In setup.xcu we have to introduce a new snippet like
${PACKAGEVERSION}
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 30 03:36:12 -0800
2006 ---
Read my first comment again.
It is *not* about Setup.xcu (although I still think t
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 30 03:19:46 -0800
2006 ---
I read very carefully. Please read my explanation more carefully. The important
fil
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 30 02:43:02 -0800
2006 ---
please read more carefully.
I wasn't talking about PRODUCTVERSION, but about PACKA
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 30 01:48:27 -0800
2006 ---
Well, I know that the user experience team decided, that this product is an
"OpenOf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
User cloph changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
User is changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
Issue #|70859
Summary|New variable (full version) in setup.xcu
Component|Installation
Version|680m188
20 matches
Mail list logo