To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
User is changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
User is changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 19 15:30:48 +
2008 ---
version1.ini and version2.ini are new in OOo 3.0. I do not know the segment_3*
file
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
User of changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 14 06:33:42 +
2008 ---
> three different scenarios:
> 1. The file is not installed, because it was not se
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 13 15:46:52 +
2008 ---
I made some test concerning the files, that are listed with "xyz has no eligible
bi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 12 15:56:00 +
2008 ---
> When you talk about the log file saying "xyz has no eligible
> binary patches",
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
User is changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 12 14:16:30 +
2008 ---
(Forgot to mention, the .msp file *does* contain patches also for those files
for w
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 12 14:11:36 +
2008 ---
> What problem with msi patching do you have?
Some files get patched, others not;
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 12 14:02:42 +
2008 ---
Here I present some sample warnings and discuss them.
ICE03 WARNING String overf
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 12 13:49:14 +
2008 ---
I make these checks nearly in every minor. And if an error appears, this will be
fi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
User tml changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 12 13:32:37 +
2008 ---
Created an attachment (id=55718)
Validation result from Orca
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92708
Issue #|92708
Summary|The MSI validator gives lots of warnings for the OOo i
|nstaller
Component|Installat
15 matches
Mail list logo
