To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112144
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 2 08:46:12 +
2010 ---
s/93325/92325/g
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112144
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Fri Jul 2 08:42:48 +
2010 ---
The topic of applying UAX#9's rules to unmarked BiDi-text not being what is
exp
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112144
--- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Thu Jul 1 14:29:33 +
2010 ---
Indeed, unicode defines plus sign as ET: weak, not neutral. But since there is
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112144
--- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Thu Jul 1 13:59:23 +
2010 ---
Isn't the embedding direction in this case LTR because the ++ follow C?
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112144
User hdu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112144
User er changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112144
User pjanik changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
==
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112144
User mbnoimi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=112144
User mbnoimi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
=
