To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
User mbayer changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
User tl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
User mbayer changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from kl...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 5 16:56:18 +
2009 ---
Didn't expect anything else. Well, ignorance is a bliss.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from alfoz...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 2 20:53:47
+ 2009 ---
How about closing this issue? In OpenOffice.org 3.0.1, there is no such
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from kl...@openoffice.org Mon Feb 2 21:28:10 +
2009 ---
From the comments (I don't have 3.0.x), it does not look like as if the problem
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 12 12:45:08 +
2008 ---
mbayer-fl: I disagree with target 3.x. As I already said above (in desc15):
even
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
User fl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
User ufi changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
User fl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 2 15:38:15 +
2007 ---
We are 2 weeks from OOo2.4.0 feature freeze now.—Can we please have a decision
on
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 20 18:10:37 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 81788 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
User maccy changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
User tl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 9 13:43:16 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 79393 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
User mbayer changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 05:26:24 +
2007 ---
*** Issue 76097 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 25 00:42:23 +
2007 ---
After having been so rudely interrupted, I would now like to return to the
topic,
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 29 02:38:26 -0700
2006 ---
Sorry, I don't do you that favour.
Good to know that dozens of representative
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 29 10:25:36 -0700
2006 ---
klama, I don't want people like you to promote OpenOffice.org. Thanks for
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 29 14:13:51 -0700
2006 ---
Is the only thing you have to say?
Nobody asked to use the old orthography in the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 29 14:36:39 -0700
2006 ---
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwins_Gesetz
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 29 16:11:33 -0700
2006 ---
Did I mention the Nazis? No. These are your associations. The extinction of the
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 29 16:20:03 -0700
2006 ---
My position is: don't talk to people who start making Nazi references in a bug
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 29 16:53:45 -0700
2006 ---
Sure. You don't want a discussion at all. Neither with nor without Nazi
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 28 15:54:46 -0700
2006 ---
No flame wars about German orthography, please. And please stop claiming things
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 1 09:41:44 -0700
2006 ---
*** Issue 69177 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
User rainerbielefeld changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 1 13:40:56 -0700
2006 ---
I am strictly against the removal of the support
of the so-called old German
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
User klama changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
User tl changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 17 06:30:36 -0700
2006 ---
As the Alte deutsche Rechtschreibung checkbox seems to have become completely
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=67386
Issue #|67386
Summary|In StarOffice 8 alte deutsche Rechtschreibung doesn'
|t work any more
33 matches
Mail list logo
