To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
User ace_dent changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
User pmladek changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 30 06:35:11 -0800
2006 ---
Sure. Here is bt from gdb:
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 23 09:22:22 -0700
2006 ---
First, could you please comment on Kay's questions (and comments)?
Sure.
-
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 20 02:57:12 -0700
2006 ---
Hi Michael,
First, could you please comment on Kay's questions (and comments)? In
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 31 00:25:37 -0700
2006 ---
I am going to take a look over the day ...
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 31 05:25:55 -0700
2006 ---
Michael, some comments:
- If I understand correctly, reducing the stack sizes
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
User mhu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
User mhu changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 30 13:06:37 -0700
2006 ---
mhu - yes, of course those pages are not backed by physical memory until they're
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
Issue #|68890
Summary|reduce thread stacks ...
Component|porting
Version|680m180
Platform|All
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
User mmeeks changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=68890
--- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 23 08:30:16 -0700
2006 ---
needs 1 more fragment:
--- sal/util/sal.map26 Jul 2006 07:46:09 -
14 matches
Mail list logo