[porting-issues] [Issue 70318] osl[in|de]crementInterlock edCount(): don't use lock prefix on single p rocessor machines

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70318 User tbo changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 70318] osl[in|de]crementInterlock edCount(): don't use lock prefix on single p rocessor machines

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70318 User tbo changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 70318] osl[in|de]crementInterlock edCount(): don't use lock prefix on single p rocessor machines

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70318 User jsi changed the following: What|Old value |New value

[porting-issues] [Issue 70318] osl[in|de]crementInterlock edCount(): don't use lock prefix on single p rocessor machines

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70318 Issue #|70318 Summary|osl[in|de]crementInterlockedCount(): don't use lock |prefix on single processor machines

[porting-issues] [Issue 70318] osl[in|de]crementInterlock edCount(): don't use lock prefix on single p rocessor machines

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70318 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 11 07:17:03 -0700 2006 --- Sorry, I meant please verify on Linux x86. Thanks

[porting-issues] [Issue 70318] osl[in|de]crementInterlock edCount(): don't use lock prefix on single p rocessor machines

To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=70318 User hr changed the following: What|Old value |New value