To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106074
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106074
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106074
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106074
User sb changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106074
--- Additional comments from c...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 20 09:55:03 +
2009 ---
oops, yes &= of course.
---
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106074
--- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 20 08:54:59 +
2009 ---
@cmc: I am unsure about the "bRet |= realpath" (instead of "&=") in the patch
o
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106074
User cmc changed the following:
What|Old value |New value
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=106074
Issue #|106074
Summary|sal: extra warnings with gcc fortify source
Component|porting
Version|DEV300m60
